Deep Takeover Hedge
1 250 USD
Download demo:
135
Publicado:
14 agosto 2020
Versão atual:
1.3
Não encontrou o robô certo? Encomende um para você
no serviço Freelance.
Ir para o Freelance
no serviço Freelance.
Como comprar um robô de negociação ou indicador?
Execute seu EA na
hospedagem virtual
hospedagem virtual
Teste indicadores/robôs de negociação antes de comprá-los
Quer ganhar dinheiro no Mercado?
Como apresentar um produto para o consumidor final?
Você está perdendo oportunidades de negociação:
- Aplicativos de negociação gratuitos
- 8 000+ sinais para cópia
- Notícias econômicas para análise dos mercados financeiros
Registro
Login
Você concorda com a política do site e com os termos de uso
Se você não tem uma conta, por favor registre-se
Version 1.2 Note:
You can now select which ADX version you want to use.
Adding that to optimization suggested [start, step, stop] ranges gives 686 possible settings
Use ADX, not ADX-Wilder, if you want the trading logic to match MT4 - FIFO version
Additional Note:
While the complete optimization on [start,step,stop] suggestions show a proof of under fitting, some people want to find the "best" .set
If you do Genetic testing algorithm you can find something very close to the "best" with parameter ranges:
In my Demo signal the .set's were selected from 343 possible settings using ADX-Wilder
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/811819
excuse a question, do you use one set for all 11 pairs in your signal? or do you use the optimized sets?
i use a unique .set for each symbol. They are in the first comment here. In the YouTube video attached to the overview page I show how to find the sets very fast, and go through all the symbols doing it in a short time. Follow along and you can find set's for symbols fast too.
Note, that the system is so under fitted, that even if you mess up, there is a good probability that bad .sets will still work.
in addition to my last comment, kindly ask to improve EA, adding for each pairs a different magic number.Thanlk you
The comment is added to the setting file. I had submitted that for validation almost 2 weeks ago, but forgot to tap the "publish" button. Sorry about that!
Regarding magic numbers, no I will not be adding them as it might make people think it is okay to trade multiple robots on the same pair on the same account, but it is not. Deep Takeover assumes it is the only robot trading one pair on the account and I will not be changing this feature.
If there is any other case for a magic number where a comment wouldn't be just as valuable, let me know.
Thank you