Deep Takeover Hedge
1 250 USD
Скачано демо:
135
Опубликован:
14 августа 2020
Текущая версия:
1.3
Не нашли подходящего робота?
Закажите собственного
на бирже фрилансеров
Перейти на биржу
Закажите собственного
на бирже фрилансеров
Как купить торгового робота или индикатор
Запусти робота на
виртуальном хостинге
виртуальном хостинге
Протестируй индикатор/робота перед покупкой
Хочешь зарабатывать в Маркете?
Как подать продукт, чтобы его покупали
Вы упускаете торговые возможности:
- Бесплатные приложения для трейдинга
- 8 000+ сигналов для копирования
- Экономические новости для анализа финансовых рынков
Регистрация
Вход
Вы принимаете политику сайта и условия использования
Если у вас нет учетной записи, зарегистрируйтесь

Version 1.2 Note:
You can now select which ADX version you want to use.
Adding that to optimization suggested [start, step, stop] ranges gives 686 possible settings
Use ADX, not ADX-Wilder, if you want the trading logic to match MT4 - FIFO version
Additional Note:
While the complete optimization on [start,step,stop] suggestions show a proof of under fitting, some people want to find the "best" .set
If you do Genetic testing algorithm you can find something very close to the "best" with parameter ranges:
In my Demo signal the .set's were selected from 343 possible settings using ADX-Wilder
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/811819
excuse a question, do you use one set for all 11 pairs in your signal? or do you use the optimized sets?
i use a unique .set for each symbol. They are in the first comment here. In the YouTube video attached to the overview page I show how to find the sets very fast, and go through all the symbols doing it in a short time. Follow along and you can find set's for symbols fast too.
Note, that the system is so under fitted, that even if you mess up, there is a good probability that bad .sets will still work.
in addition to my last comment, kindly ask to improve EA, adding for each pairs a different magic number.Thanlk you
The comment is added to the setting file. I had submitted that for validation almost 2 weeks ago, but forgot to tap the "publish" button. Sorry about that!
Regarding magic numbers, no I will not be adding them as it might make people think it is okay to trade multiple robots on the same pair on the same account, but it is not. Deep Takeover assumes it is the only robot trading one pair on the account and I will not be changing this feature.
If there is any other case for a magic number where a comment wouldn't be just as valuable, let me know.
Thank you