Hello,

An example of testing an adviser 2018.01.01 - 2019.08.09.

Default settings are created for EURUSD M15.

Best Regards

Hello,

Thank you very much for your interest in my products.

Contact me if I can help you with anything.

Best regards.

Hi Alex,
Thank you very much for this EA.

Here are a list of ideas and improvements for you to take in mind for further versions:
-Trailing Stops.
-Trade in both directions simultaneously. You can do it for now, using 2 sessions of the EA.
-Protection when spread is too big.
-Protection for slippage.

Best Regards,

Elkinmar1

Hi Everyone,

During simulations I've found that M5 Time Frame has much better performance than M15. However, it is riskier.

You need to simulate a lot, to find the right set that fits your risk appetite. During simulations I've found that the potential is huge.

Let's see how it goes with the Real Account trading.

Best Regards,

Elkinmar1.

Minimal step between orders - Minimum step between orders (if needed)

it's in Pips or Point ? thanks

Hello.

Thanks for your suggestions. I think they are good. In future updates, I will probably add these options.

Best regards.

M5 is also interesting to me, if you share the sets that you tested, I will be grateful to you.

Hello,

it's in Pips or Point ? - In points

Best Regards

 I find it difficult to optimize these parameters, can I ask what they do when I change the values, so as to have a logic in what I do?
Thank you

Period for oscillator - period of the oscillator
K1 for oscillator's zone - Oscillator coefficient №1
K2 for oscillator's zone - Oscillator coefficient №2
MA Period - Moving Average Period
Main Trend filter - The main trend filter (The more, the more signals. But their accuracy is less)
Trend filter decrease per order - coefficient decreasing the main trend filter for each subsequent basket order

Hello,

If we talk about the main trend indicator, then its variable parameters are the MA period, on the basis of which it is built, as well as a trend activity filter. The EA filters the trend for possible reversals, that is, the filter is more about the degree of admissibility of a reversal than about filtering the trend. The shorter the MA period and the higher the trend filter, the more active the permission to open an order from the trend block will be.

After obtaining permission to trade from the trend block, the adviser will expect a confirmation signal from the oscillator. The period of the oscillator determines the activity of its work, the smaller the period, the more active the signals will be. The oscillator uses not the passage of dimensional marks, but the passage of zones. That is, the smaller the coefficients, the more active the signals will be, and vice versa.

I wrote this through a google translator. I hope that the translation is correct. If not, please let me know, I will rephrase my answer.

Best Regards 

Hi Alexander,

For first update, would you make the EA to take into account the swaps and commissions for drawing the Take Profit Lines?
Please confirm that the algorithm takes profits adding and/or subtracting the swaps and commissions. (It seems to me that only the lines are not been drawing correctly).

Best Regards,

Elkinmar1

Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to share how I am trading with this EA, with this short simulation (one month).
Here is a quick comparison on using the EA with a single session (long and short) versus using it with double sessions (one for longs and one for shorts at the same time).

1. USD/JPY , 5 min , Long and Shorts

2. USD/JPY , 5 min , Longs Only

3. USD/JPY , 5 min , Shorts Only

As a Summary we have:

As you can see, if we use 2 sessions (one for longs only and another for shorts only), we would have a much better performance than using a single session for longs and shorts. During normal operation, the EA doesn't allow to open longs and shorts at the same time, so we need to use 2 sessions to accomplish this.

There is not an automatic way to calculate the exact Drawdown in the simulation, when using 2 sessions at the same time. I just have put the sum of the Drawdowns of the single sessions for longs only and shorts only as the worst case scenario, but it will never be like that, as while one session is accumulating the other one is profiting. 

Please note that the parameters used in the simulation are kind of aggressive, but very profitable. I've used 5M Time Frame which has increased risks, compared with 15M or longer Time Frames.

I am trading a Real Account with this exact same parameters with double sessions and for 3 majors EURUSD, GBPUSD and USDJPY all of them in 5M Time Frames. I am ready to act in case of a big trend emerges, locking the basket that needs it, and activating a Recovery EA to try to recover that specific basket. Although the EA has a lock basket function available, I am not using it for now and it will be a future point of discussion with the author.

Warning: The settings used for this simulation are high risk from my point of view. The author has developed this great EA, but its profitability is totally up to us. My advice is to simulate a lot and have a plan ready for all the possible scenarios you can face trading Forex or your preferred instruments. 

I will be sharing some more long term simulations within the next few days.

Best Regards,

Elkinmar1

Ok, will be added. I will add this as an option in the input settings.

Thank you very much for sharing this information with us.

Hi Alexander,

For further versions of the EA, It would be good to add:

• "Close Current Basket" Button.
  
• "Buy" and "Sell" Buttons, so we can add positions to the basket.

Hello,

Ok, I will add them as an additional panel.

Thanks for your idea.

Best Regards

Advanced trend reversal trading!

Link to the product:

Get MT4 Version
👉  https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/27079

Get MT5 Version
👉  https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/28908

AW Trading Software

Hello.

This EA uses grids. In Expert Advisors that use grids in their work, averaging is used instead of stop losses. It is for this reason that the classic Stop Loss has not been added to "AW Scalping Dynamics".

Best Regards.

I understand that a classic stop might not work, but surely the option for an overall loss limiter of some kind to close all orders if balance falls below X% would be useful to protect gains.