Discussion of article "Interview with Irina Korobeinikova (irishka.rf)" - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Ask Renate. They were building their own-your-my-our-our-cloud while they were building their own, they must have felt a lot of interesting criteria....
Just kidding.
Anatol, since you're the guru on duty today, tell me: Is time iterative or recursive? What do they say about it in your spaces?
Ask Renate. They've been building their own-your-my-our-our-cloud.
Gentlemen "philosophers", have you got the wrong branch? Or maybe it's your evening promenade? Before going to bed, so to speak.
Ask Renate. They've built their own, my-your-your-your-your-cloud, and they've felt a lot of interesting criteria...
Just kidding.
Anatol, since you're the guru on duty today, tell me: Is time iterative or recursive? What do they say about it in your spaces?
I am intensively interested in science, but basically I weave all this knowledge into my view of the world from a philosophical point of view. I do not operate with the concepts of higher mathematics and could not prove or disprove anything. I am not adapted to it at the current moment of time, but I am sure that I could develop this quality in myself. And I have been convinced of it many times, but in other fields. ))
I think a good answer to the question would be to watch a very good film, in which I found some coincidences in my reflections the other day. It proves (for me personally) that the same thoughts can be had by different people, and gradually it shows up unexpectedly no matter how much an individual is immersed in the study of a particular scientific field. ))
I am intensively interested in science, but mostly I weave all this knowledge into my view of the world from a philosophical point of view. I do not operate with the concepts of higher mathematics and would not be able to prove or disprove anything. I am not adapted to it at the current moment of time, but I am sure that I could develop this quality in myself. And I have been convinced of it many times, but in other fields. ))
I think a good answer to the question would be to watch a very good film, in which I found some coincidences in my reflections the other day. It proves (for me personally) that the same thoughts can be had by different people, and gradually it shows up unexpectedly no matter how much an individual is immersed in the study of a particular scientific field. ))
Muddy film, in the sense that the whole thing is dark, the transfer feels like it's about to end, it only lasted 5 minutes.
I liked it. It's probably the most sensible of the quantum-religion stuff I've come across. I even downloaded a clip.
--
About "theories of everything". If you're not familiar, here you go: Anthony Garrett Lisi, in 2007 he came up with The exceptionally simple theory of everything.
If you watch the TED talk in Russian translation , I recommend the one in 3 parts - the translation is better there.
On his site there is Elementary Particle Explorer - a cool program to demonstrate the layout of elementary particles in 8-dimensional space. Cool, don't pass by.
I liked it. It's probably the most sensible of the quantum-religion stuff I've seen. I even downloaded a clip.
--
About "theories of everything". If you're not familiar, here you go: Anthony Garrett Lisi, in 2007 he came up with The exceptionally simple theory of everything.
If you watch the TED talk in Russian translation , I recommend the one in 3 parts - the translation is better there.
On his site there is Elementary Particle Explorer - a cool program to demonstrate the layout of elementary particles in 8-dimensional space. Cool, don't pass by.