Discussion of article "How to Make a Trading Robot in No Time" - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The key phrase ". it's all realised."
Of course, of course. "All this is implemented" in a perfect infallible form on the basis of the richest practical experience of mass education.
If there are questions, if something is unclear, then "one should read all materials 100% indiscriminately and without whining", "a person is stopped solely and only by laziness".
Dissenting young theorists with their theorising and low lacking level of practical knowledge and experience - "Go to the garden" (c).
Of course, of course. "All this is realised" in an ideal infallible form on the basis of the richest practical experience of mass education.
If there are questions, if something is unclear, then "one should read all materials 100% indiscriminately and without whining", "a person is stopped solely and only by laziness".
Dissenting young theorists with their theorising and low level of practical knowledge and experience - "Go to the garden" (c).
Exactly.
And by answering very clearly I try to move people to a more real understanding. Thankfully, I understand this topic and have invested enough real money in it.
By the way, on the topic of the article - has anyone read the Turtles book mentioned in the article? It's all gone down to a discussion of the proper presentation and catologisation of knowledge. Is there anyone who wants to actually get knowledge from people who can be trusted?
Maybe they write books for nothing... :)
By the way, on the topic of the article - has anyone read the Turtles book mentioned in the article? ...? Is there anyone who wants to actually get knowledge from people who can be trusted?
Maybe they write books for nothing... :)
I've read it. But I don't understand your question. What are you driving at?
Any knowledge is useful, and from people who have achieved results - even more so. There is a statement by Renat: "you should read all the materials 100% indiscriminately and without whining". It is true in essence and in practice (although exaggerated and out of place in the above context).
I've read it. But I don't understand your question. What are you getting at?
You ask a lot of questions about the article, it is obvious that you are not satisfied with it. Maybe then tell us point by point - in what part it is not clear and why it does not fulfil its purposes.
The content of the article is perplexing. The goals and objectives of the article are unclear. The target audience is unclear. Who was this article written for? What did the author of the article want to convey and to whom?
At least, the title of the article "How to create a trading robot ..." does not correspond to its content.
By the way, on the topic of the article - has anyone read the Turtles book mentioned in the article? ...? Is there anyone who wants to actually get knowledge from people who can be trusted? Maybe they write books for nothing... :)
No, I don't understand the countertext of your phrase. What did you mean?
About the article. I read the article with interest. As komposter has already noted: "It is pleasant to read, good slogan". The article touches on a number of issues, but to speak out, criticise, agree, discuss - I personally do not understand the aims and objectives of the article. What did the author want to say in his article? As they say: "what is your point", "what did you mean"?
No, I don't understand the countertext of your phrase. What did you mean?
About the article. I read the article with interest. As komposter has already noted: "It is pleasant to read, good slogan". The article touches on a number of issues, but to speak out, criticise, agree, discuss - I personally do not understand the aims and objectives of the article. What did the author want to say in his article? As they say: "what is your point", "what did you mean"?
Maybe the article is just for newcomers, about harassment of whom you personally wrote a few comments ago?
Maybe the article is just for the newbies whose harassment you personally wrote about a few comments ago?
To paraphrase your quote: the key word is"may". And it is not newcomers who are harassed on the resource, but "brainstorming", including for the sake of which you created the resource.
I have already expressed my opinion on the article on the 1st page:
At least, the title of the article "How to create a trading robot ..." does not correspond to its content.
The word "create" is derived from "create, create". The article does not contain information on the question: "How to create a trading robot and not lose time".
Maybe then tell me point by point - in what part it is not clear and why it does not fulfil its goals.
To paraphrase your quote: the key word is"can". And it is not newcomers who are harassed on the resource, but "brainstorming", including for the sake of which you created the resource.
A little later I will try to write more detailed answer to the words:You ask a lot of questions about the article, it is obvious that you are not satisfied with it. Maybe then tell us point by point - in what part it is not clear and why it does not fulfil its goals.
Let me explain my point of view, which is expressed here https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/7186#comment_279149.
1. Let's try to define the target audience (for whom the article is written).
The article is called: "How to create a trading robot". The key word is "create."
The article begins with the paragraph "To create a trading robot, you need a trading system". That's right: the rule "trading system - trading robot" is stated. Next, a couple of theses:
- "Every beginner, coming to the market, hopes to get or create a clear and strict trading system, which can be translated into the language of algorithms";
- "Every trader should independently go through all stages on the way of creating his own trading system".
It is not clear from the 2nd thesis: will the article talk about creating a "trading system" or about creating a "trading robot"? Probably, in the introductory conclusion there is a caveat and it is correct: "Every trader should independently go through all the stages on the way of creating his own tradingrobot".
The 1st thesis is controversial. Not every newcomer that comes to the market sets a task to find/create a trading robot. Since the article is published only on the mql5.com resource, it is addressed to those who came to the resource just for a trading robot. And if so, then the target audience of the article is:
1. those who have created their own trading system and wish to translate it "into the language of algorithms".
2. those who do not have their own trading system, but wish to get/find a trading robot.
Call this category "beginners"? Beginners in what? Maybe newbies as visitors of the resource? Because "newbies in trading" is incorrect. Beginners in studying/searching for "algorithm language" - perhaps, yes, but not every beginner on the resource is a person who wants to "create" a trading robot.
2. So, the target audience identified at the beginning of the article is "those who are looking for a trading robot" and "those who want to create a trading robot". Since the title of the article is "How to create...", the article is not for the category of "trading robot seekers". And further in the article we expect recommendations on how to "create a trading robot". Those who wish to "create a trading robot" are divided into those who already have a trading system and those who are only looking for one.
The article goes on to advertise MT4 and MT5 as terminals capable of satisfying the ambitions of trading robot creators. But it is not clear why positioning on Forex, because MT allows you to work not only with currency instruments.
And the thesis: "In any case, Forex instruments are attractive for creating trading robots, and the majority of supporters of automated trading hone their skills on currency pairs" is controversial. Here again there is a question about the target audience. This thesis is more suitable for those who "want to create a trading robot", but do not have their own trading system.
3. How to start creating a trading robot
Under such an intriguing title there is a certain classification of "approaches to building an automated trading system".
But the 1st and 2nd approaches are not approaches to building an ATS. They are approaches to building a trading system: the 1st approach is abstract; the 2nd approach is concrete.
In the 2nd approach there are clearly contradictory theses:
- "The second approach takes as a basis the study of market regularities";
- "does not make assumptions about the driving force of the market".
one thesis excludes the other, and the second thesis is controversial, because, for example, candlestick patterns are only based on technical assumptions about "market driving forces".
Also, since "the second approach is based on the study of market patterns", it is not clear why the emphasis is placed on technical analysis and nothing is said about fundamental analysis (especially MT5 displays news releases with flags).
The 3rd and 4th approaches seem to fall under the classification of approaches to creating a trading robot.
But the 5th approach - buying a trading robot - again has nothing to do with the mentioned classification. Buying a trading robot is more appropriate to the title of the article "How to find a trading robot".
4. First steps in creating a trading robot
This title says: "in this article we will talk only about the second approach, which is already a classic one".
Then it recommends searching for a trading robot in the codebase. And when the title of the article is "How to create a trading robot" - to race and optimise a robot from the codebase in a tester. What does this recommendation have to do with the title of the article "How to create a trading robot"? It is more suited to the title "How to find a trading robot".
For "how to create" in this paragraph, it would be better to:
- recommend codebase as an example of writing a trading robot,
- recommend articles as educational material for writing a trading robot,
- recommend wizard as a tool for automatic creation of a trading robot based on an existing trading strategy.
5. A rare bird can reach the middle of the Dnieper River
This is what the title of the article should be - so far neither the author, nor readers, nor advertisers of MK resources have not yet reached the middle of the topic.