
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
On the relevance of calendar data.
For comparison the work of another source.
Result.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Libraries: Calendar
fxsaber, 2023.04.13 00:07 pm.
Looks like I got a Calendar corrector that matches the trading server.
Result.
Matches the Web-calendar. If anyone sees any obvious inconsistencies, let me know.
Now it seems to be correct to use the calendar for backtests.
I got this result:
Looks like it turned out to be a Calendar corrector that matches the trade server.
Result.
Matches the Web Calendar. If anyone sees any obvious discrepancies, let me know.
Now it seems to be correct to use the calendar for backtests.
Inconsistencies are seen all over the place:
//---
Please check this for yourself as well.
Inconsistencies are observed across the board
You can't compare by 840200001-event, because it has a weak influence on quotes - the time of the left column may be incorrectly calculated.
Thanks, I took a closer look and understand the proposed method.
I think for some cases it would be more interesting to look at a certain time range (before and after the event) to see how much the price has changed.
Inconsistencies are observed
After updating the library Calendar should be synchronised with the quotes history on any broker.
Check (run on EURUSD).
Result.
It will be necessary to check the correctness during the autumn Europe/USA unsynchronisation.
Now you can use the calendar in backtests (the sample EA in the delivery has been updated).
ZY I recommend you to look at the works of this author.
I have a bad feeling about the correctness of this function.
Using limits from calculus: the output range for (x % 24) is 0 to 23, so the output range of the function is -3 to 20. therefore a server of -5 cannot be represented.
I have a bad feeling about the correctness of this function.
Using limits from calculus: the output range for (x % 24) is 0 to 23, so the output range of the function is -3 to 20. therefore a server of -5 cannot be represented.
You are right, thank you.
subtract directly from 12:30 (instead of -3 + 31*/2):