AI 2023. Meet ChatGPT. - page 204

 
Реter Konow #:
All in all, an interesting technical phenomenon.
It's about as useful as a dictionary or Google. And such a kind of p....yay dictionary, whose answers need to be checked. It exists, but it is greatly exaggerated :)
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
...

What the nerds pretend to be AI is mostly human-prepared answers or reinforcement-type algorithms. And where they are not prepared - you can see with your own eyes the absurdity of the answers.
Millions of users participate in the training, giving likes/dislikes to the answers. Of course the model will be so effective in generating "correct" text).
 
Реter Konow #:
There are millions of users participating in the training, giving likes/dislikes to the answers. Of course the model will be so effective in generating the "right" text.)
Right. And the manifestation of intelligence is in other things. For example, the ability to synthesise new knowledge through inference.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
It's about as useful as a dictionary or Google. And such a kind of p....yay dictionary, whose answers need to be checked. It's there, but it's greatly exaggerated.)
For ordinary users - yes. The usefulness is not great (although something can be invented), but for the hype around high-tech industry and for the promotion of technological YouTube channels, the usefulness is incredible.
 
Реter Konow #:
For ordinary users, yes. The benefit is not great (although something can be invented), but for the hype around the high-tech industry and for the promotion of technological YouTube channels, the benefit is incredible.
It's like a dictionary that gives approximately correct answers in some cases, which you then google to double-check anyway.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
It's like a dictionary that gives you roughly correct answers in some cases, which you then google to double-check anyway
That's how it works.

For example, it is necessary to check information on the number of calories in foods. For those of you who exercise.
 
In principle, a tool is a tool, but for some reason it causes a certain form of insanity (I have it too), when it seems that HE will now decide everything for everyone. That some higher power has appeared. That it is stronger and smarter than us. And so on.

In short, many psychologically can not withstand the impact that this tool has on them. Phenomenon.
 
Реter Konow #:
In principle, a tool is a tool, but for some reason it causes a certain form of insanity (I have it too), when it seems that HE will now decide everything for everyone. That some higher power has appeared. That it is stronger and smarter than us. And so on.

In short, many psychologically can not withstand the impact that this tool has on them. Phenomenon.

This is how advertising and social engineering works.

 
Today in conclusion:

The fourth chapter of "The Rise of AI" will be structured in two parts:

1. exploring the effects of LLM on the psyche. What happens to the user's conscious and subconscious mind. How and why "matrix" and "terminator" are born in the mind and how to get rid of them.

2. How the global market will continue to react to the "invasion" of AI - we will simulate the flooding of the market with stamped products, cheapening of robotics, widespread automation of production and the reaction of the population.

 
Реter Konow #:
In custody today:

The fourth chapter of AI Uprising will be constructed in two parts:

1. An exploration of the effects of LLM on the psyche. What happens to the user's consciousness and subconsciousness. How and why "matrix" and "terminator" are born in the head and how to get rid of them.

2. How the global market will continue to react to the "invasion" of AI - we will simulate the flooding of the market with stamped products, cheapening of robotics, widespread automation of production and the reaction of the population.

I felt point 1 on myself, well, in terms of all these semantic links and how we ourselves think in words (actually, we don't think in words) became interesting. In general, LLM is a paradise for linguists, in terms of studying languages and meanings.

As for purely language(s) - it's a solid A. Well, that's how they were originally conceived.

Imagine, you have learnt to express your thoughts better than others (at least better than Andrei), and you are already rated by others as having a higher intelligence! Although you just learnt to use the structure of language well.
Reason: