Pair trading and multicurrency arbitrage. The showdown. - page 272
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'm sick of seeing illogical calculations.
------
Let's say a box of matches costs 10 roubles and cigarettes 200 roubles
matches and cigarettes have risen in price by the same amount - 2 times
how to show that their prices move in the same way????
---
so,
divide 20/10 = 2.0
divide 400/200 = 2.0
---
next
opening prices: 10 и 200
divide 10/10=1.0
divide 200/200=1.0
i.e. prices to start moving from zero (it is necessary to determine whether the price has fallen relative to zero or increased???), it is necessary to subtract the opening price.
we have FormulaE:
current price=(close-open)/open (check for the initial price: (open-open)/open=0.0, ok)
Or simply:
The formula is:
close/open - 1.0
to make a triangle, superimpose all pairs, multiply the whole Formula by the sign: +1.0 or -1.0
add the result
и
О!
Eureka!
We have myscreenshots!!!!!
О! Hi! Don't delete the post! I'm getting the info!
О! Hi! Don't delete the post! I'm getting the info!
Yeah.
Don't be disappointed.
The first conclusion that comes to mind is that it's impossible to make money.
i.e. the forex always has two pairs in reserve, if you trade on one.
because of these two pairs it can play the third price any way you want.
It touches upon Volodya Izersky's question: why does the price always go against the open order?
Because the forex always has two pairs forming a triangle and it can easily afford to take our money.
Yeah
Don't be disappointed.
the first conclusion that comes to mind is that it's impossible to make money.
i.e. the forex always has two pairs in reserve if you trade one.
because of these two pairs, it can play the third price any way it wants.
This brings up Volodya Izersky's question: why does the price always go against an open order?
Because the forex always has two pairs forming a triangle and can easily afford to take our money.
Oh, that Izersky - he's already annoying with his fantasies.... )
Oh that Izersky - annoying already with his fantasies.... )
All the indices and cleverness are useless.
draw this one and you'll see for yourself.
You can make it in 40 years, nothing will change.
It's always zero and nothing else.
It's as simple as an egg.
that's the whole forte, the simplest algorithm of work, nothing surprising and supernatural at all, and there's nothing to do there.
You can have a laugh:
TA, FA, news, news, machine learning, forecasts, super strategies and other stuff.
whatever, that's not the point.
---
© new-rena
ahahaha
gentlemen, follow the thoughts of ...........
I'm sick of looking at illogical calculations.
------
Let's say a box of matches costs 10 roubles and cigarettes 200 roubles
matches and cigarettes have risen in price by the same amount - 2 times, i.e. 20 and 400.
how to show that their prices move in the same way????
---
so,
divide 20/10 = 2.0
divide 400/200 = 2.0
---
next
opening prices: 10 и 200
divide 10/10=1.0
divide 200/200=1.0
i.e. prices to start moving from zero (it is necessary to determine whether the price has fallen relative to zero or increased???), it is necessary to subtract the opening price.
we have FormulaE:
current price=(close-open)/open (check for the initial price: (open-open)/open=0.0, ok)
Or simply:
The formula is:
close/open - 1.0
to make a triangle, superimpose all pairs, multiply the whole Formula by the sign: +1.0 or -1.0
add the result
и
О!
Eureka!
We have my screenshots!!!!!
It's so hard to think ??????????.So if eurus to buy, and pound and cros to sell, then the sum of eqi will also be zero. The point of these calculations. I have also thrown the same thing there.
The point is that if several people open like that, then yes - lock will be made.
If several people open on one pair - who buy, who sell, there will be a lock too.
and if there is no lock, then the rest (shortfall) will be opened on SME futures, but not traders anymore, and still there will be a lock.
all the time, all the time.
accordingly, only the ...
it's clear what's not written, I hope.
the lock can be made by the quote movement.
If you develop the theme of this Formula, you need to think about the profit and the cost of a tick (you need to calculate it yourself, because on the history it is different, not the same as the current one) and the lot, because there is already a part of it: close-open.
then you will see the real volumes on the market, their ratio at least.
and anyway, it won't do anything, it's useless.
This forex algorithm will drive everyone into the lock anyway.
The thing is, if a few people open up like that, then yeah, they'll lock up.
if several people open on one pair - who buy, who sell, there will be a lock, too.
and if there is no lock, the rest (shortfall) will be opened on SME futures, but not traders, and still there will be a lock.
all the time lock, all the time
so the only thing that will work in the lock is ...
well, it's clear what's not written, I hope
lock can be made by the movement of the quote
if you develop the theme of this Formula, you should think about the profit and the cost of a tick (you need to calculate it yourself, because on the history it is different, not the same as the current one) and the lot, because there is already a part of it: close-open.
then you will definitely see the real volumes on the market, at least the ratio.So if the euro is in buy, and the pound and cros in sell, the sum of eqi will also be zero. The point of these calculations. I've thrown the same thing there.
Where was it, in this thread?
where was it, in this thread?
Schmoebius loop, right after your screenshots .I was just bluffing a bit, I wanted to get this individual to talk.
Oh, that reminds me.
I've been through all that.
a lot of thoughts and new thoughts and tested old thoughts.
The important thing is to understand
price movement depends on open orders and nothing else.
and the process of opening an order is different for everyone, statistically it is 50/50.
and if the quoter needs to add, for example, a strike, he will drive the quote down and vice versa.
he has the whole picture in front of him.
I always think of oil below zero.
That says what?
the quoter got too drunk and confused plus and minus ))))
that's who rules, ahaha