There's no systematic approach here - it's all improvisation...
Imagine fishermen discussing whether the colour of a silicone bait is important. And here you are: "Yes, it's rubbish, the most important thing is the wiring".
Sergey Gridnev #: Imagine fishermen discussing whether the colour of a silicone bait is important. And here you are, "Yeah, that's bullshit, the most important thing is the wiring."
No, you picked the wrong example...
If you had said that I fish with a swath, you would have got it right...
Ridiculous! Comparing a systematic approach to a price-dependent strategy with a lottery, where a number is chosen from the ceiling...
Ridiculous! Comparing a systematic approach to a price-driven strategy with a lottery, where a number is chosen in the ceiling...
Where is the comparison of a systematic approach to the lottery?
But there is no systematic approach here - it's all improvisation...
Zhorik has been hanging out with his advisers for three years now, and he can't make up his mind...
There's no systematic approach, just improvisation...
There's no systematic approach here - it's all improvisation...
Imagine fishermen discussing whether the colour of a silicone bait is important. And here you are, "Yeah, that's bullshit, the most important thing is the wiring."
No, you picked the wrong example...
If you had said that I fish with a swath, you would have got it right...
Sergei, you've convinced me, it's all bullshit. Put it out properly! Right away with the working code.
Yes of course, where one setting works on all pairs ;)