What would it take to get everyone to finally switch to MT5? (collecting opinions) - page 46
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's not that you can't implement it yourself in the code, it's that it has to be implemented because it's essentially nothing that the developer can't implement himself, so you get the impression that you're blatantly hammered, and do you want to go to the place where you get hammered?
I don't think so...
It's like when you don't hold out your hand with a note, they hold it in your hand and force you to reach over and grab it, you can grab it and it will be given to you, but you realize you're being abused...
You're mocking yourself.
Yes, nothing changes. It's still the same concrete wall, impossible to break through. Sometimes you go along with some of the programming stuff, but as for some of the trading stuff, it's useless. Even though implementation is really sticking (although introducing hedging would probably help. But on the exchange, you'll still be hanging out behind Quicks with your integrated stops), even the fact that this topic exists points to that.
Nadora in general, not really understand the purpose of being here, so much time consuming. I've written to moderators here asking them to remove my profile, but no reply or hello. To make the stubborn statements less and increase the overall level of rationality, I'll ask here - delete my profile (with the expectation that someone authorised to do so will read it).
Yes, nothing changes. It's still the same concrete wall, impossible to break through. Sometimes you go along with some of the programming stuff, but as for some of the trading stuff, it's useless. Even though implementation is really sticking(although introducing hedging would probably help. But on the exchange, you'll still be hanging out behind Quicks with your integrated stops), even the fact that this topic exists points to that.
Nadora in general, not really understand the purpose of being here, so much time consuming. I've written to moderators here asking them to remove my profile, but no reply or hello. To reduce stubborn statements and to increase the overall level of rationality, I'll ask here - delete my profile (hoping that someone with the authority to do so will read it).
How about a little more detail here?
How about this for more details?
What's not to understand? The man is trivially ignorant. But there is so much righteous anger in his speeches, it brings a tear to my eye...
Not aware that a hedging order system has been introduced for forwards? I do not understand what you are saying.
Your "although the introduction of hedging would probably help" suggests that you just don't know that hedging has been in place for a long time.
Or you have constructed your sentence in such a way that you don't understand it.
Your "although the introduction of hedging would probably help" suggests that you just don't know that hedging has been in place for a long time.
Well, or you have structured your proposal in such a way that the point is not clear.
Artyom, well, that's just picking on words. The Russian language allows for different constructions that can be twisted in different ways, but you twisted it the way you want. Here's my post from yesterday.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
What does it take to get everyone to finally switch to MT5? (collecting opinions)
pavlick_, 2019.02.10 13:13
Already spoken in Renat's words )). A rapid development, visible to people with a developed abstract and philosophical outlook. I suggest you check out the early work
That is such a development.
SZS: A few years ago you would probably be talking with the same enthusiasm about the irrelevance of CCA as you are today? Screwed in the hedging. And, in my opinion, there's nothing for X millions to do in the financial markets.
Artyom, well, that's just picking on words. The Russian language allows for different constructions that can be twisted in different ways, but you have twisted it the way you want. Here's my message from yesterday.
Goodness.
I mean, sketches are done here and now, but evidence is done later.
The position is clear and uninteresting, sorry.
Here is, as promised, the proofs...
some explanations: in four Expert Properties - tab Optimisation - Maximum drawdown - 70%...
in five leave only one agent...
timeframe - 1m, at opening prices...
optimization period at your discretion, EURJPY currency pair...
hope to share results and impressions)
How many times slower is a 5 than a 4)