Is there a universal system? - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
People here in the Forum talk about Warren Buffett, who had a 42-year average annual return of 22.39%. And it's presented as a role model.
You have to keep in mind that he trades without leverage.
You should note that he's trading without shoulders.
He's not shoulderless. He's really trading. There's a big difference.)
Hi all!
This question arises: are there any universal trading systems that can show a good positive trend on a long history?
Well, it is clear that:
1) A good, strong, almost undeflected trend kills any rebounding, counter-trend system.
2) A flat in any of its manifestations, nullifies a trending system.
3) Scalping may lead to loss of the deposit, even in the absence of news. A good short-term excursion of the price and losses (if not losses) are guaranteed.
What are the options that would take into account the disadvantages of each of the above systems, and is it possible in principle?
P.S. If there are, if you know of any, please share.
I share: you buy blue chips and hold them till you're blue in the face.
on the pullback, you buy up...
They don't exist. Imho.
It definitely does not exist, because if it did, everyone would use it, and if everyone used it, it would cease to work. Because the market always goes against the crowd.
was that what you were taught in the course?
As the market always goes against the crowd.
That's a strong statement. I wonder how he does it?
You're not alone though - there's a selection on the score against the crowd. A whole crowd of traders against the crowd.)
That's a strong statement. I wonder how he does it?
You're not alone though - there's a selection on the score against the crowd. A whole crowd of traders against the crowd.)
In this case the crowd, that's the side where more money can be made. There are 1000 lots on one side and 1001 on the other, so he'll go to the stops where there's more.
It's very easy to manipulate the price if you can make money on it.In this case, the crowd is the side where more money can be made. There are 1000 lots on one side and 1001 on the other, so it will go to the stops where there are more.
It is very easy to manipulate the price if you can make money on it.The market does not follow the stops, the market knows nothing about their existence and can only guess). But the DC is quite capable of following your stops - they are all on his screen. Especially considering that the DC's direct responsibility is to quote instruments.
The market does not follow the stops, the market knows nothing of their existence and can only guess). But the DC is quite capable of following your stops - they are all on his screen. Especially considering that the brokerage company is responsible for quoting instruments.
We can argue about this for a long time, just as we argue about futures redemption.