From theory to practice - page 946

 
Alexander_K I'm just reading to see if anyone has anything intelligent to say.

The last 100 pages are nothing but spam.)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

The point of cycles is to settle down and wait out the slump.

Maybe that's what people liked, I don't know.

But the deeper one looks into history, the more one must forget it, because it is in the past.

The future determines the recent past as well, but mostly the present.
Throw me a signal in your personal message) it's a pity that you're the only one here who understands how to get results... Well for Forex even one or two is a lot :Q
I will be glad to read your comments. Maybe I will discover something new for myself).
It's a pity so few people have moved on from theory to practice).
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

You, Alexander, do not understand just one simple thing, the market is a random process and it is impossible to predict it reliably, whatever some people say. You have to shift the probability in our direction somehow in order to make a profit. If it is impossible to shift the guessing (at least for a long time), then we have to shift the profit, so that total profitable trades will have more profit than loss-making ones. In general, similarly as in poker). And this shift is possible at least 70/30.

Yuri, the market is a random process.

The only thing that is not random is that it goes towards balancing supply and demand, otherwise it would be a sponsor...

Just like the temperature on Earth and many other things.

You can predict almost anything, you just have to know how.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Yuri, the market is a random process.

The only thing that is not random is that it goes towards balancing supply and demand, otherwise it would be a sponsor...

Likewise the temperature on Earth and many other things.

You can predict almost anything, you just need to know how.

These are all general words, Renat.

 

Aaahhhh...

What's going on on the chif!!! Beautiful!

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

It's all generalities, Renat.

If you only knew how elementary it is.

The only snag is that the discoverer has no one to consult with and can't at the same time.

I've been scratching out a few lines of code of mine for about 4 months.

I will publish the formulas, I don't feel sorry for them.

I'm preparing a preprint now.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

I've been scratching out a few lines of code of mine for about four months.

I'll publish the formulas, I don't feel sorry for them.

I'm preparing a preprint now.

Except you don't have to do that. Better not. You can tell trusted people in your ear, although that's no razzo either.

But I think it's just another self-delusion.

But I agree that the market is simple and scientific nonsense is unnecessary.

 
Alexander_K:

Aaahhhh...

What's going on on the chif!!! Beautiful!

There must have been a glitch.

;)

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Except you don't have to do that. It's better not to. You can tell trusted people in your ear, although that's no good either.

But I think it's just another self-deception.

But I agree that everything in the market is simple and scientific nonsense is superfluous.

Not that it's superfluous, but as I wrote above, it leads to late predictions.

the result of which is ex post facto, nothing more.

and without publishing the result, you cannot become the author of the idea, let alone develop it.

Yury, think about it - all these curves in the global consideration is nothing more than polynomials of N-order. You can count on your fingers what is used for various calculations.

Well how many it is possible to litter various sciences with them?
 
Alexander_K:

Aaahhhh...

What's going on on the chif!!! Beautiful!

PARITY
Reason: