From theory to practice - page 657

 
hartmann:
I'm telling you from this picture:



and we're talking about CME here, not forex.

SMEs need to first learn and understand how this happens

Now, that's a challenge.

The strategy still won't work, but as they say, you'll be closer to the body

;)
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

SMEs need to first learn and understand how this happens

That's a challenge, that's a challenge.

well, you can see that commercials and speculators are moving in opposite directions. speculators are behind the market.
 
hartmann:
Well you can see that commercials and speculators move in opposite directions. speculators follow the market.
speculators do not have insider information, plus requotes and many other things... they will not make it to the market anyway, at least the bulk of the crowd
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

SMEs need to first learn and understand how this happens

That's quite a challenge.

the strategy still won't work, but as they say, you'll be closer to the body

;)
my opinion is this:

this is the picture we're looking at.

It was not just one trader who opened these trades. Many traders opened, some higher and some lower.

Where will they close these deals?

The one who opened lower and closed higher - is the one who earned the most.

They don't think that all traders lose or all gain.

You may be wrong.
 
hartmann:
My opinion is this:

This is the picture we see here.

It's not just one trader who opened these deals. Many traders opened them, some higher and some lower.

Where will they close these deals?

The one who opened lower and closed higher - is the one who earned the most.

They don't think that all traders lose or all gain.

You may be wrong.

Go to the real, see with your own eyes how your dough starts to melt, see that your trades for some reason are counter-trending

this is typical

Here's an example, it's mostly buy signals on a falling price:

Forum on Trading, Automated Trading Systems and Trading Strategy Testing

From theory to practice

Alexander_K2, 2018.10.12 22:37

I listened and listened to CheGevara (about Gauss on large TFs and quantile=1.6 etc.) and decided to make a simple indicator:

GBPJPY 2018 pair.

Used:

1. CLOSE M1

2. sliding window - week (7200 values CLOSE M1)

3. simple MA

4. dispersion calculation according to the formula from this branch + quantile =1.6

Looking at:

A total of 7 trades would have been made in 2018 (+6/-1)

Total profit: +733 full points.

If anyone is sure this is the Grail, let them set up a TS and post it here. Right to the branch. Let the suffering enjoy.

As the saying goes: "No matter how much you trade, you'll still get..."

The problem has now been solved. I'll reassure you - there is a solution. Good luck.

;)
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
the problem has now been chewed up, I'll reassure you - there is a solution, good luck.
;)

that's what people who don't know the solution usually say)

 
hartmann:

that's what people who don't know the solution usually say)

;)
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Go to the real, see with your own eyes how your dough starts to melt, see that your trades for some reason are counter-trending

this is typical

Here, for example, it's mostly buy signals on a falling price:

As the saying goes, "You may or may not trade, but you'll still get..."

Now the problem has been solved, let me reassure you - there is a solution. Good luck.

;)
on a falling price to buy - because the masha on a falling price is above the chart.
and the bottom bollinger line is kind of high. ;)
 
hartmann:
on a falling price into a buy - because the masha on a falling price is above the chart.
and the bottom bollinger line is a bit too high. ;)

It's got entropy, ticks, a random number generator, some kind of returns and a lot of other stuff.

And in the end - again, it's the counter-trend

;)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

It's got entropy, ticks, a random number generator, some kind of returns and a lot of other stuff.

and it's still in contra-trend.

;)

what entropy?
masha is ordinary. and bollinger :)
Reason: