From theory to practice - page 46
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Provide an illustration of what has been said. Fortunately the history of these plots is easy to pull up.
By bell, do you mean Student's, Cauchy's or Gauss's and who else?
They're all bell-like as it were. I'm also curious where you saw"looks like half a bell".
Now that's definitely an artefact phanomenon. And the original source of the data here would also be useful for analysis...
Please attach it.
I'm not stripping, because it's clear what's going to be there.
Construct the histogram according to the solution used by the author, taking into account that the price goes like this
won't the dear author (or any of the active participants) be so kind as to make some resource, a site/wiki for example, honestly accumulating what has been said in the thread?
it's getting a bit difficult to read the second branch of a forum in a row just to keep abreast of it :-)
Good to hear from you again!
I think the topicstarter (and not only) would benefit from the info on the old links : H-vola and more. Kagi and renko - no better way so far.
I do not think that thinning ticks is reasonable in principle - we will watch the strobe effect, and miss all the interesting stuff.
And in the rambling to the average Wiener process we can also apply the "Promiscuous Bride" - then the entry point (according to Berezovsky) will be a bit better...
😎
That's right, Michael!
Also wrote about ithere. Tick noise needs to be filtered out without any options.
And at the same time I would like to know why the respected author deletes his previous posts in this thread - with pictures, histograms, links to the project, and many others?
won't the dear author (or someone from active participants) be so kind as to make some resource, a site/wiki, for example, honestly accumulating what has been said in the thread?
it's getting a bit difficult to read the second branch of a forum in a row just to keep abreast of it :-)
Yep -https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/abolk is about to go boar.
D)
What about the difference in the arrival of ticks in different DCs?
Or do we stretch through matching coefficients?
I do not see a problem with that. The results of any TS, model, EA will differ in different DCs. The more robust the model is, the less perceptible are the differences.
I don't see a problem with that. The results of any TS, model or Expert Advisor will differ from one brokerage company to another. The more robust the model, the less perceptible the differences.
At least different plugins on entry/exit.
Obviously, only those who have an ATS worthy of attention will notice
And at the same time I would like to know why the respected author deletes his previous posts in this thread - with pictures, histograms, links to the project, and many others?
My posts, like me, are Schrödinger's cats in Hilbert space :)))))))))))
Alexander_K2:
But, I thought - am I a physicist or not a physicist? Which is more important to me - money or truth? Truth! That's it!
And at the same time for some reason I opened an account with real money. And when it goes down the drain it's like, "I told you money is not important to me".
It's weird, isn't it?