From theory to practice - page 158
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Have you done this yet? Genius!
I've had this for years ))
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
From Theory to Practice
Alexander_K2, 2018.01.24 20:53
And yes - I will not abandon the above algorithm even under torture. I just need to improve it a little.
On Jena, one of the energy accumulation patterns worked beautifully for me. It went off like a shotgun :). And on the yen too.
What is your sample volume for GBPJPY ,GBPCHF, GBPUSD ,USDCHF, USDJPY?
One of my energy accumulation patterns worked beautifully on Jena. It shot out like a shotgun :) And so did the yen.
What is your sample size for GBPJPY ,GBPCHF, GBPUSD ,USDCHF, USDJPY?
GBPAUD = 36100
GBPCAD = 44100
GBPCHF = 40,000
GBPJPY = 44100
GBPUSD = 40,000
USDCAD = 28900
USDCHF = 22500
USDJPY = 22500
Am I the only one who can't make it? I'm a sucker... Ugh...
Does it look like?
Averaging is common, at higher risks it will pour out. 20% in two years is nothing.
averaging is common, at higher risks it will pour out. 20% in 2 years is nothing.
I may have just shown what the topstarter is aiming for:
p.s. How to insert the report correctly?
Is that better ?
Is that better?
Well, 200% is normal... but if it were a year.
you could compare it to some not very liquid small business)
well, 200% is normal... but if it were a year
you could compare it to some not very liquid small business.)
You can bet on 10 pairs ))
The load on the deposit allows.
And yes - I won't give up the above algorithm, even under torture. I just need to fine-tune it a bit...
Since your acquaintance with retail Forex has already reached the difference between trend-flat, and you've seen that your algorithm shows better results on the flat currencies, perhaps you should choose currency pairs, whose trend movements are usually more flat. Here http://www.argolab.net/izuchaem-zigzagi.html is a way (and MQL program) to analyze instruments by this trait:"The most counter-trend pairs: AUDCAD AUDNZD".
P.S. By the way, the gravitation of "overshots" values to 1 defined in this article means that their distribution in the first moment is tending to be exponential (Markovian) with lambda = 1. This is the value of lambda that you yourself use when generating exponentially distributed time steps between readings of course increments (if I didn't miss anything).
And yes - I won't give up the above algorithm, even under torture. I just need to refine it a bit...
Why is stochastic or MACD worse?
Oh yes, they were invented a long time ago, so it's not interesting, you need to reinvent the wheel.
Spit on this algorithm and rub it out.
The key thing you need is an algorithm that signals in advance a change of trend character, a change of trend to another trend or a change of flat to a trend, a change of trend to a flat.
In one phrase, a change in the characteristic of a movement. For such a miracle you are sure to get a recognition here.
But all this is still baby talk (albeit scientific), noodles in a sandbox.