From theory to practice - page 153
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A point of principle.
Everyone is saying that we should check the history and, preferably, test it in real time for 50 years, then yes, OK, we will take it into operation.
Let us think about it. Here we have a plot of the behavior of the probability amplitude (the lower one from those I have posted for AUDCAD), in fact it is the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation for this currency pair.
Read Feynman:
I.e., what we see on the chart is the behaviour of the wave function. It CANNOT change, it is the only one for a particular currency pair. This means that all we have to do is test it on a meaningful sample size (think 1-2 months) and that's it - it's done.
Prepare your pockets, dust them off!
OK, she's the only one.
Let's take the pair EURCAD, it has a unique trajectory.
Would this trajectory change if the news that the instrument "OIL Brend" became cheaper?
Recall that Canada is an oil supplier and Europe is a consumer.
Well, bicycles can be useful. I used to study the market that way. When you invent a bicycle and then find out that it's already been done, it's useful in that you have a deep understanding of the problem.
On the other hand, bicycles show that the inventor is amateurish. A person without having studied the experience of those who came before him, ventures into an unknown realm. Naturally, one will be in for a world of hurt.
Personally, I am impressed by his energy, I even write off some boastfulness to inexperience in developments, so I will not judge strictly.
That's what I'm saying. It would be a simple beginner - bullshit question that such a great one. It is just strange when a scientific person invents a detrended dash and the limits of deviation and does not understand it. Isn't it weird.
It's easy for you to invent a machine, but physicists need five years of study for that)))
Reading Feynman:
By the style of presentation, probably the Feynman Lectures in Physics. Written, by the way, for students in the mid-60s.
And what did the Landau-Lifshits have to say on the subject?
A point of principle.
Everyone is saying that we should check the history and, preferably, test it in real time for 50 years, then yes, OK, we will take it into operation.
Let us think about it. Here we have a plot of the behavior of the probability amplitude (the lower one from those I have posted for AUDCAD), in fact it is the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation for this currency pair.
Read Feynman:
I.e., what we see on the chart is the behaviour of the wave function. It CANNOT change, it is the only one for a particular currency pair. This means that all we have to do is test it on a meaningful sample size (think 1-2 months) and that's it - it's done.
Get your pockets ready, dust them off!
Alexander, in the financial market a hike from point A to point B is a price movement from the highest risk just drained to the next highest risk, which of course is less than the previous one.
Personally, I don't see any parralliance to probability theory, much less Schrödinger's equation.
So I am waiting for the result of real trades.
OK, it's the only one.
Let's take the EURCAD, which has a single trajectory.
Will this trajectory change if the news that the "OIL Brend" instrument has fallen in price?
Recall that Canada is an oil supplier and Europe is a consumer.
OK, it's the only one.
Let's take the EURCAD, which has a single trajectory.
Will this trajectory change if the news that the "OIL Brend" instrument has fallen in price?
Recall that Canada is an oil supplier, while Europe is a consumer.
And now let's assume that the OIL Brend did not change.
Does that mean that a single trajectory has two options?
Or maybe not two? maybe more? maybe the mutual influence of currency pairs and other risky assets is stronger than we assume?
In presentation style, probably "Feynman Lectures in Physics". Written, by the way, for students in the mid-60s.
And what did the Landau-Lifshits have to say on the subject?
Prival at one time also spoke about finding a coefficient for the pound. Thought similar thoughts. It turned out not to be the same at all...
Well Prival was shooting down targets with missiles. Now it turns out that the earth is round and S-400 (not to be confused with Sokolov) has problems with over-the-horizon targeting.
Inadequate model of market representation leads to inadequate methods.
Well Prival kept shooting down targets with missiles. Now it turns out that the earth is round and the S-400 (not to be confused with the Sokolov), has problems with over-the-horizon targeting.
Inadequate model of market representation, leads to inadequate methods.