From theory to practice - page 1555

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

Halegop

Thank you, where did the sorcerer go?
 
aleger:

Which threshold are we talking about? Is it the turning point or something else?

The threshold above which we consider an imbalance to have begun.

 
Alexander_K:

The sorcerer is in the woods. He said not to disturb.

There is a woodsman in the forest, not a sorcerer.

 
Roman Kutemov:

a threshold above which we consider an imbalance to have begun.

The balance and imbalance of the main buying and selling parameters should be monitored continuously,

using the data obtained at the right time and in the right place, namely in the trend reversal areas.

 

Alexander_K:

coveted formulae


Logically, they say buy cheaper and sell dearer.

Then classically it can be represented by a triangle, for example:

eurusd - buy

eurgbp - sell

gbpusd - sell


Each currency is either bought or sold, but it is important that the condition is met:

eur < cheaper than usd

eur > more expensive than gbp

gbp > more expensive than usd , but gbp < cheaper than eur


Except that such triangles are unlikely to occur very often, if at all.

Correct me if I am wrong.

 
Forex is an over-the-counter, non-centralised market and it is impossible to calculate OM for it. It is possible to take data on currency futures, but their market is much smaller.
 
Alexander_K:

You need a specific formula for calculating these parameters:

Without it or the ability to accept such data in the TC, all the work is in vain.

it's empty

 
Alexander_K:

You need a specific formula for calculating these parameters:

Without it or the ability to accept such data in the TS, all work is in vain.

This is a market sanction, it also cannot be known for the market as a whole, but only for individual TSOs. TheXpert seems to have done this.

 
Alexander_K:
And, by itself, this information cannot make a profit, as Rena thinks. It can be applied only as part of the TC. as a coveted key.

this is bullshit, not a key

 
Alexander_K:

Isn't that rubbish?!!! Hearst coefficients, autocorrelation, etc. etc. - nothing works. I stand by my words - I've tested it in real life and it's an ironclad fact!

Don't stop me from crying in my old age way...

I agree, it doesn't work - it's a fact.

Why should you cry? You're young! You got your whole life ahead of you!

Look at it this way: you're relying on some kind of average. What's average? What does it consist of? The average equates the best and the worst, making them equally grey. But you have to catch the best.

Reason: