From theory to practice - page 1041

 
Alexander_K:

:)))

I was reminded of the film "Profession - Investigator" with G. Burkov:

"- Are you married?

- A widower.

- Why are you not getting married again?

- I am 65 years old already.

- How old is that? It's common in the West. If only there was money!"

О! Finally the branch leader shows up.
 

Alexander_K
:

:)))

I was reminded of the film "Profession - Investigator" with G. Burkov:

"- Are you married?

- A widower.

- Why are you not getting married again?

- I am 65 years old already.

- How old is that? It's common in the West. If only there was money!"

You dream))

 
Aleksey Ivanov:
Oh! Finally, the leader of the branch has appeared.

:))) Nah, I'm still on a stakeout... Hopefully I'll be back in action next week. Got a couple of ideas (about the quote reading method and considering process entropy as a memory measure) - need to check it out. And trading in a channel relative to a certain average is the base. It only needs to be improved.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

By the way, a couple of seconds is not utopian at all. It's quite realistic. There are no particular problems. "Understanding of market processes" will not be required).

Going back in history for a couple of seconds or stepping into the future for a couple of seconds are equivalent actions. Impossible.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

Going back in history for a couple of seconds or stepping into the future for a couple of seconds are equivalent acts. Impossible.

Not every Impossible is equivalent, the opposite is also true.

 
The lag of information behind the times is legitimate, the advance is a little fantastical.
 
Uladzimir Izerski:
The lag of information from time is legitimate, the advance is a bit fantastical.

I answer to myself.

This is not about markets.

Markets are analysed on the assumption of a possible scenario.

And on history, you can dream about how "I would have made money")))

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

I answer to myself.

This is not about markets.

Markets are analysed on the assumption of a possible option.

Yes, yes. It is impossible to know the future, but we analyse it successfully).

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Yes, yes. It is impossible to know the future, but we analyse it successfully).

It is OK to judge the future state of the market from history. But the accuracy of the prediction decreases significantly with time.

The smaller the time range, the more accurate the prediction.

 
Alexander_K:

There are a couple of ideas (about accounting for process entropy as a measure of memory).

It turns out the article I read didn't do any good)

"No, uncle, you can't sell an elephant that way." (с)