From theory to practice - page 991

New comment
 
Martin Cheguevara:

I am doing just fine.

I am talking about those who have not listened to advice from Renat, Igor, Koldun, Eugene, Moya.

Please note that this advice is similar to each other.

All in this thread has already been painted to the smallest detail.

Who wants to find it, finds it.

Everything is on the surface.

If I found something interesting in your posts, I would listen too.

 
Roman Shiredchenko:

I didn't understand in detail

the greater the increment, say in a second, the stronger the impulse was

but that's after the fact.

and the number of ticks per second, that's interesting, I've noticed that too, especially on a 5-digit
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

the greater the increment, let's say in a second, the stronger the impulse was

but that's after the fact.

I see. How to formalize?

 
Roman Shiredchenko:

I see. how to formalise?

already formalised - a set of timeframes
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

the greater the increment, say in a second, the stronger the impulse was

But that's after the fact.

And the number of ticks per second, that's interesting, also noticed, especially in the 5 digits

The "dolls" are working on the eighth digit. They're comfortable.

 
Uladzimir Izerski:

The "dolls" are working on eight signs. They are comfortable.

playing with a one in the last digit?

;)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
formalised already - a set of timeframes

:-)

 

Returnees are certainly a good thing. Even if the distribution isn't exactly Laplace.

But... There is such a grey truth in life :

It's the "relative fluctuations" of the indices of the major majors.

You can see with the naked eye that 80% of the time they are basically doing their own thing.

But there comes (periodically all the time) the X-hour, when the evening is not so gloomy and the movements are in the same direction.

Who has an idea how to catch such a moment? have a bunch of graphs M, and catch synchronous movements N (close to M) of them

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

play with a one in the last division?

;)

Man, once again you've spammed a competent branch - the only one I read here, apart from "League..." and "Any newcomer's question..." :-)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

play with a one in the last division?

;)

Basically. Yes.

You didn't know before that?

1...984985986987988989990991992993994995996997998...1981
New comment