Who or what is stumbling around - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
We should, we should put salt in the wounds to better remember, let them ache.
Source:http://stuki-druki.com/Aforizmi-Visockiy.php Stuki-Druks ©
It's a bit too much.
That's where I'd like to see a monument to murdered diplomacy.
There is no universe, there is a point which doesn't exist either. Everything else seems to us to be an illusion. Man's main goal is to quickly evolve out of this stupid meaningless state, which is also tied to some planet, which is already full of people. There are things that do not need to be created and they will exist forever, you just need to come to them and then everything else will happen :) The main things in life are not things :) Neither are people, it is your space that you create from within yourself, you project emptiness from emptiness, because from the centre (you) emptiness always diverges evenly and rounds into a three-dimensional sphere on a large scale, so our consciousness is always round and all objects on a large scale become round as projections, and on small ones too. Well someone still has everything flat :) It's quite possible that you're not either, and I'm communicating with you as my projection. Well... it's like Buddhism :)
It's beautifully written) I could not so express my thoughts, despite the fact that it is my thoughts). Of course I'm not here and there's no one here either, we're talking to ourselves here. Not only there is nothing, but in addition there is everything that used to be and everything that will be, and there is nothing to do about it, that's how we live here, we evolve/degrade, and we have to deal with it. Well, that's good, there will be something to do in the next infinite years.
It's beautifully written) I couldn't express my thoughts in such a way myself, even though these are my thoughts). Of course I'm not here and there is no one here either, we are talking to ourselves here. Not only there is nothing, but in addition there is everything that used to be and everything that will be, and there is nothing to do about it, that's how we live here, we evolve/degrade, and we have to deal with it. That's good, it'll be something to do for the next infinite number of years.
Five years of philosophy... ahahaha... I remember that at seminars we were pouring out so much that Plato would have cried from emotion
Yeah, it's as simple as that, sitting at your computer...
The task is not that difficult if you describe the whole context.
There was no division between freight and passenger wagons. Workers travelled in the same wagons as the machines.
Each worker disassembled his machine tool himself, packed it himself (or supervised his assistants), accompanied it (i.e. physically travelled in the same carriage as the machine tool) and assembled it in a new location.
Now the problem comes down to only two components: logistics (where to send which carriage), and construction (at which point which machine tool to put).
On the second task, the plants were recreated exactly as they were, so the worker knew where to place his machine tool. By the way, there were no walls, and the machines were simply placed on the ground, and then the building was constructed around it. Therefore, when a worker came, he saw four pegs with the inscription "2 workshop" and told those who were unloading: my machine tool had to stand here.
Logistics was also not that complicated because the cars themselves were talking, I mean people in the cars could answer to which plant they were going to. And it was enough to put a board at every station to indicate which arrow which plant to send to.
For programming purposes, the general idea is to store information that is important for the facility in the facility itself.
The task is not that difficult if you describe the whole context.
There was no separation between freight and passenger cars. Workers travelled in the same wagons as the machines.
Each worker disassembled his own machine tool, packed it himself (or supervised his assistants), accompanied him (i.e. physically travelled in the same carriage as the machine tool) and assembled it in a new place.
Now the problem comes down to only two components: logistics (where to send which carriage), and construction (and at what point which machine to put).
On the second task, the plants were recreated exactly as they were, so the worker knew where to place his machine tool. By the way, there were no walls, and the machines were simply placed on the ground, and then the building was constructed around it. Therefore, when a worker came, he saw four pegs with the inscription "2 workshop" and told those who were unloading: my machine tool had to stand here.
Logistics was also not that complicated because the wagons themselves were talking, I mean people in the wagons could answer to which plant they were going to. And for every hub it was enough to put a board at which arrow which plant to send to.
For programming purposes the general idea can be taken from here, store the information that is important for the object in the object itself.
It's in the principles of the internet, too.
That's why everything works.
Hi Yura,
I see you've signed up.)
Will you be entering contests?
Hi.
Can't keep up with you, this is to become a legitimate signal subscriber )
A verbal excuse, no response
I didn't think it would be necessary to explain/explain the obvious (in my opinion) things, but okay, I will explain literally "on my fingers", so that there are no misunderstandings. Once, when I was in Greece, I noticed the way locals talk - when they say something, they always gesticulate and illustrate what is being said with their hands and very often at the end of the sentence they say "katalavaino? (Russian for "understand?" or "understand?") ....
Yes, I know what and where it is relevant, I remember the phrase 'fools and roads' from my school days. By the way, the roads are better now...
Just in case (in case someone thinks differently) I would like to notice that fanaticism and patriotism have nothing in common, except the same ending...
By any chance did you get the idea that quoting old jokes may not always have the purpose of making someone laugh (regardless of national or linguistic differences)?
I'll start explaining in reverse order:
- "quoting old jokes may not always be intended to make anyone... laugh" - indeed, I only quoted the joke in order to express the opinion that it is not logical to chide a man (you, by the way, were attacked) for his predilection for the female sex... Catalavano?
- "Bigotry and patriotism ... have nothing in common" - a statement like "we strive to do well, better than anyone else, and if things don't work out, we'll work on it" sounds optimistic and patriotic, a statement like "things suck over there, but with us everything is great", in my opinion, has nothing to do with patriotism... Catalaves?
Shall I explain about "fools and roads" too, or is it already catalavano?
So it's in the principles of the internet, too.
AND THE OOP
I was trying to hint at the fact that same-sex marriages are allowed in Europe, but are not welcomed in Russia.
The hint is understandable, but on this subject again a joke comes to mind:
A resident of the capital is visiting a relative in the countryside. They went for a walk in the evening and happened to come across some fondling "lovebirds".
- Vasiliy, you said there are no gays in your village, but look what they are doing!
- Well, they're not gays, they're p******s!
"Not welcome" is good, but not enough... At one time it was fashionable to say: "They don't have Stalin on them! In today's realities I would paraphrase slightly: "Ramzan Akhmatovich is not on them!