Here's what you can do with OpenCL directly in MetaTrader 5 without any DLLs - page 9

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I am familiar enough with the situation in the market, because I've spent some time studying it, to agree with your statement about the current state of affairs. However, this situation can be explained by the following:
Therefore, the advanced traders have their own programmer, and he, too, is not in the category of "I'll make it for 10", if the super advanced trader has a staff of programmers there. Or do you expect the trader managers from Deutsche Bank, Citadel and others to come to you for products?
Go ahead, I'll watch your progress.
That's why the advanced have their own programmer, and he's not in the "I'll do it for 10" category either, if the super advanced trader has a staff of programmers there. Or do you expect the trader managers from Deutsche Bank, Citadel and others to come to you for products?
Go ahead, I'll watch your progress.
There are a lot of smart and advanced traders in the world. They must have complex and original ideas.
Good point!
And another TSLab and/or S# will appear, which will glitch, slow down and create a lot of negativity for MT. It's better not to do that, and to write code in its pure form as it is.
I ran the test with the sea all normal but the sky is all in artifacts, what could be the reason for this?
Tested on quad TITAN X (Pascal)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #0: NVIDIA Corporation TITAN X (Pascal) GPU with OpenCL 1.2 (28 units, 1531 MHz, 12288 Mb, version 376.53, rating 3895)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #1: NVIDIA Corporation TITAN X (Pascal) GPU with OpenCL 1.2 (28 units, 1531 MHz, 12288 Mb, version 376.53, rating 3895)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #2: NVIDIA Corporation TITAN X (Pascal) GPU with OpenCL 1.2 (28 units, 1531 MHz, 12288 Mb, version 376.53, rating 3895)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #3: NVIDIA Corporation TITAN X (Pascal) GPU with OpenCL 1.2 (28 units, 1531 MHz, 12288 Mb, version 376.53, rating 3895)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #4: Intel(R) Corporation Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699A v4 @ 2.40GHz with OpenCL 2.1 (44 units, 2400 MHz, 130982 Mb, version 6.3.0.1904, rating 662)
2017.03.19 14:38:31.883 OpenCL Device #5: Intel(R) Corporation Intel(R) CPU Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699A v4 @ 2.40GHz with OpenCL 2.0 (44 units, 2400 MHz, 130982 Mb, version 6.4.0.25, rating 647)
And another TSLab and/or S# will appear, which will glitch, slow down and create a lot of negativity for MT. It's better not to do that, and to write code in its pure form as it is.
I totally agree.
Excuse me, but what are we talking about here?
Personally, I could use a wizard to visually create interfaces, like in VS. And I don't need an EA made of blocks. Tried playing around in Simulink, realised that I would write 10 times faster and better by hand.
Peter, download Matlab and try to build something more or less serious in its Simulink, your eyes will be opened to many things at once. Otherwise you can fantasise for a long time...
Personally, I could use a wizard for visual creation of interfaces, like in VS. And I don't need an EA made of blocks. Tried to play around in Simulink, realised that I'll write 10 times faster and better by hand.
Peter, download Matlab and try to do something more or less serious in its Simulink, it will immediately open your eyes to many things. Otherwise, you can fantasize for a long time...