
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Eugene, here's an easier option. The data is in the attached file.
Here we clearly see the strong influence of the spread. Two charts, but one and the same TS.
It would seem that it is almost $1900, so the profit will be about.
But it is only $307.
Here I am attaching the archive with the two files. Same TS: OrdT1.csv - limit's orders, OrdT0.csv - stop's.
SL/TP seem to be not small (600), but both are "perfectly" stable - by losses! :)
Do something about it. :)
Here, opened the first file.
Plotted the "balance in pips" chart.
I look at it and think: "Here is a chart of one person who trade by the signals of his TS. What should be the spread, so that the other person, ... who traded with him a second in a second, but AGAINST, was in deficit ...?
Either I misunderstood something in the file, or this example is not suitable at all to demonstrate the difficulties with reversal...
Eugene, here's an easier option. The data is in the attached file.
Here we can clearly see a strong influence of spread.
It would seem that it is almost $1900, it means that the profit will be about.
But it is only $307.
You're doing something very wrong, sir...
Let's see what it is.
What exactly do you do when you trade AGAINST your TS signals?
Spread everywhere is 18 pips versus 650 pips SL/TP (first data file).
Once again - you post your data, we'll compare. Maybe there is a bug in the tester (I doubt it!). :)
Theoretically suspecting that something is wrong is one thing. But to check or prove with data in hand is another.
I've already written that - strict reversal. We use SL==TP==800 (second data file). Then in the first (direct) case all orders are only SELLSTOP, in the second (reverse) all orders are BUYLIMIT only.
What is wrong, and how are you doing it?
I suggest to exclude any other "statistical processing" for the sake of purity of the experiment.
Spread everywhere is 18 pips versus 650 pips SL/TP (first data file).
Once again - you post your data, we'll compare. Maybe there is a bug in the tester (I doubt it!). :)
Theoretically suspecting that something is wrong is one thing. But to check or prove with data in hand is another.
That's what I've already written - a strict reversal. We use SL==TP==800 (second data file). Then in the first (direct) case all orders are only SELLSTOP, in the second (reverse) all orders are BUYLIMIT only.
What is wrong, and how are you doing it?
I suggest to exclude any other "statistical processing" for the sake of purity of the experiment for the time being.
in archive v2 the first file - so a change of direction will help. and in the second file not to me - around zero - I wonder how to be
So what will you do with the first file (strategy)? :)
How do you convert the trades?
So what will you do with the first file (strategy)? :)
How do you convert the trades?
In the strategy(first file) replace sellstop with buylimit
That's exactly what I did and got the second file in the archive! :)
Take a close look, read here.