
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Eugene, I've tried both (1) keeping the stops and (2) increasing/decreasing them by the spread size to compensate for the spread and (3) adjusting the stops so that reverse trades close at exactly the same time and prices as straight trades.
I suggest you draw or take a screenshot of a chart where your forward position worked, and where the reverse worked. At what levels are the stops there and there.
Good afternoon, dear colleagues
But, personally, I'm not interested in just posting graphics.
What I'd most like to see here is people's reasoning...
And ready-made "verdicts" like "ok"... or "crap" - not cool... No, it's not.
Clarify what 50 / 50 means - that the signal may be correct 50% of the time?
Yes, 50% of the signals will be correct.
But explain in detail pls how you change the stops.
Shifting them by the value of the spread.
Volume is lots, not points of stops.
Yes... it's lots.
What's there to reason about. It's second grade maths. A drain of two spreads per trade on a flip will give you zero. You can argue till morning, you can't change that.
And, like, it doesn't make you happy in any way...?
I don't know, but you can drink to that.
About shifting the stops by the width of the spread - I argue it won't give an accurate trade-to-trade feed. But not the point - the difference won't be very big.
Most importantly, it's not very convenient. Also here I was saying that:just trading against is NO guarantee that you'll make a profit. You have to manage your lot as well. But then what's the point of "flipping"?
It's easier, imho, to take a more adequate TS on the fly. Nevertheless, I tried to do "as you did" for the second variant (1st TS settings are "out of hand" now):
Here the blue line is the balance of the "normal" TS, the orange is just a flip, the grey is "+ worked the lot". :)
All this really worked out in the tester.
Basically, for me you have proved the realism of working with these methods.
What's interesting, I've tried almost all of these myself.
Now I can think about working with a little more serious statistical processing.