I am plagued by questions of the universe - page 33
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I haven't read all his works, but how is he doing with mobility?
I'm afraid to twist his theory. You'd better read it. If you have any questions, ask.
Well, as if with motivation to spend time there is still a problem. Look, there is a very simple criterion to distinguish science from scholasticism: can it do something which the wrong science cannot do (and preferably forbids)? Not in the sense of smoother explanations, but for it to glow or buzz or something like that. Does the new physics have any such projects?
That's a good question. It has crossed my mind too. I don't know the answer yet.
Probably not yet, for otherwise the author wouldn't fail to shout about it.
Well, as if the motivation to spend time is still a problem. Look, there is a very simple criterion to distinguish science from scholasticism: can it do something that the wrong science cannot do (and preferably forbids it)? Not in the sense of smoother explanations, but for it to glow or buzz or something like that. Does the new physics have such projects?
Read it. There's a bit about that in there too.
No, I don't mind, let people exercise logic, as long as they are interested. But until I'm presented with a specific argument (namely presented, and not offered to look somewhere in this pile), I will not waste time, I have my own cockroaches, there's no one else to feed them :))
I agree with him about the science crowd in many ways, though. But gathering another crowd is not the answer :)
With billions of already known galaxies multiplied by the number of stars in each of them and the planets, there is a very large, even huge chance that we human beings, created from particles of cosmic matter, will be at a very low stage of development compared to the others.
don't get too carried away... marusya is a former speculator... a man... and even illiterate :-)))
Having billions of already known galaxies multiplied by the number of stars in each of them and planets, there is a very large, even huge probability for us humans created from particles of matter of space to be at a very low stage of development in comparison with others.
Have you tried to look at it from another point of view?
In my view, it would be more right to speak not about the level of development but about the level of fall, degradation. How low the world of people in which we live is in the hierarchy of worlds.
After all, if the universe is expanding, then it is gradually cooling and degrading. And the living beings that inhabit it are gradually moving from higher worlds to lower worlds. It would be wonderful if the process could be reversed.
Do you have a reference from the Bible? Job is the reference you gave...
In fact, by the way, it's not monotheism, it's polytheism.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F
Well from the first sentence about the experiment with quantum teleporter. from the wiki all mythical legendarity of the chip disappears
Read more about Bell's inequalities - the wiki has that too. I'm not strong in quantum mechanics, but something about non-locality/realism is clear there.
And remember the Pauli principle as well, by the way.
In general, quantum mechanics has enough tricks that are incomprehensible to ordinary common sense.