Practice testing, reflection, discussion... - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
any mirroring is, alas, impossible... the electron was also considered a particle... you seem to think of price as some kind of unambiguous factor, and it's just a distribution
of the probability density of being at a given point... :-))) Simply put, the price is always a fuzzy strip, the width of which is constantly pulsating,
it fluctuates, depending on the good faith of your broker... That is, regardless of whether it is mirror-unmirror, you will be unpleasantly surprised with how accurately (up to a point)
only the long term strategy may be the best way to achieve a good return on your investment ... If you don't want to lose your profit in the long run, you may lose your trading confidence. only the long term with such a strategy can bring profits,
and working intraday and below - all this is more than questionable
(mirror or no mirror, the worst scenario will always work out for you...)
how's this for a quote for example ? :-)))
mirror or non-mirror, making trades inside the channel will make you a millionaire in a couple of hours...
any mirroring is, alas, impossible... the electron was also considered a particle... you seem to think of price as some kind of unambiguous factor, and it's just a distribution
of the probability density of being at a given point... :-))) Simply put, the price is always a fuzzy strip, the width of which is constantly pulsating,
it varies, depending on the good faith of your broker... That is, regardless of whether it is mirror-unmirror, you will be unpleasantly surprised with how accurately (up to a point)
only the long term strategy may be the best way to achieve a good return on your investment ... If you don't want to lose your profit in the long run, you may lose your trading confidence. only the long term with such a strategy can bring profits,
and working intraday and below - all this is more than questionable
Ok - let's fix this point on purpose during this experiment too (since there is such a disagreement...)
...
Isn't that so...?
Not so. Your results will be lower than expected (for both of you) by the amount of spread from each trade. That's a minimum.
Interesting thing...
I'm minus 30 points, you're plus 30 points - why would the results be "less"...?
In what way? Exact copies of losing trades, but done in the opposite direction, should make a profit, equal to the loss of the "Signal Source"...
The point is that you don't analyse the market and you enter on a 50/50 system.
And you will not make a profit that way.
I want to surprise you and some doubters a bit.
Any even the smallest movement can be predicted with probability close to 100.
I imagine a wave of anger. But I will not interfere any further.
Kent, I don't want to ruin your air lock, but I will warn you (everyone else already knows): it is impossible not to lose a deposit by trading on the market as a deliberately random process (random trade directions, etc.). That's one. And two: you won't have total profits on a combination of two flat/ trend systems. The difference will be a -2 spread in pips and an overweight of losses in the money leading to an inevitable drain. At least the above applies to a martingale automatic.
А.
Kent, I don't want to ruin your air lock, but I will warn you (everyone else already knows): it is impossible not to lose a deposit by trading on the market as a deliberately random process (random trade directions, etc.). That's one. And two: you won't have total profits on a combination of two flat/ trend systems. The difference will be a -2 spread in pips and an overweight of losses in the money leading to an inevitable drain. At least the above applies to a martingale automatic.
А.
Well, that's what this show is all about.
We will see here how not to lose deposits by a random process, and what the result of "mirror" trades will be... and everything else.
Practice is the criterion...
Practice is the criterion...
PRACTICE ON REAL is the criterion! Double it or dump it - that would be the criterion. It will, indeed, be possible to observe and monitor there... and somehow - take an interest... I suggest that you organize a micro, but the real, and wishing to participate (me included), pour it for observation, at least 1000 rubles ... As many as they can...
10 000 rubles on the micro-real - well, the 30 000 cents (it is possible that your approach can be a smaller amount ...) - you can already be courageous to let the martin and the like on the MSF
Then - and then - and watch, and watch, and assess, and draw conclusions... What is the problem of organizing a trading account?
Otherwise - empty calculations and drawn figures! IMHO!
Practice is the criterion...
This is true for complex systems, stuffed with intelligence and equations, whose behaviour cannot be modelled in the mind.
For a martin, it's simple, but if you don't know enough to do a mental experiment in the probability space, then you're welcome to drain it. It's not a real deposit, is it?
Wow, how many people get caught up in randomness.
... It's impossible not to lose a deposit by trading the market as a deliberately random process (random trade directions, etc.) ....
What surprises me is this...
If I caught a one-buck sucker on the first trade, then doubled, and took a profit of the same number of pips - then I'll make a dollar purely on the fluctuating statistics of the outcomes.
If that statistic spins around zero and doesn't creep down at a huge rate - won't a profit be made? Where can one go wrong here...? (Statistics with negative dynamics - not to be considered. The question is simply theoretical)