Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 161
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Oh, by the way, is the doughboys doughboying or non-doughboying? )))
I am far from Alexander, I do not work with such risks
graph for 7 months (1733.3%). It's up to you to decide whether it works or not
I am far from Alexander, I do not work with such risks
graph for 7 months (1733.3%). It's up to you to decide whether it works or not
Do you define cointegration by regression angle?
Do you determine cointegration by regression angle?
No. The classic method of determining co-integration on the gap. There is a lot of information about the classical method of co-integration on the internet.
P.S. In general, I vowed not to write in this thread anymore, because I was swamped with questions and inquiries
No. The classic method of determining co-integration on the gap. The information on the classical method of determining co-integration in the Internet sea.
P.S. In general, I vowed not to write in this branch anymore, because I was swamped with questions and inquiries
Why do you need all this?
I am far from Alexander, I do not work with such risks
graph for 7 months (1733.3%). It's up to you to decide whether it works or not
I do not understand, real or what?
What do you need all this for?
No reason at all, just haven't been here for a while (no time).
Synthetics, when properly prepared, are viable and that's it.
No reason at all, just haven't been here for a while (no time).
Synthetics, when properly prepared, are viable and that's it.