Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 12

 
Aleksander:

No :) I have to look: I pressed a combination... now it's crossed out... - maybe i will reveal some parameters at different times :-) p1 p2 p3 p4 and so on


in 80 days, these parameters will be disclosed as before but all at once, which is convenient.

ZS: highlight text and change style to "plain text"

 

in general, come back in 80 days :-) there you will know all parameters :-) or maybe I will get mad :-) and describe parameters one by one per day (week/decade) :-)

so better check back in 120 days :-)

--- for yesterday's bath day, I should have posted a couple of texts :-)

xxxxx4874 d7 t71 buy 0.15 p1 1.3514 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t72 1.3497 0.00 0.00 0.00 -25.50
xxxxx4875 d7 t71 sell 0.51 p4 0.9931 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t72 0.9952 0.00 0.00 0.00 -107.62
xxxxx4876 d7 t71 sell 0.43 p3 0.9793 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t72 0.9777 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.80
xxxxx4878 d7 t71 sell 0.38 p2 1.5920 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t72 1.5903 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.60
xxxxx7745 d7 t73 buy 0.20 p1 1,3510 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t74 1,3494 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -32.00
xxxxx7746 d7 t73 sell 0.51 p4 0.9935 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t74 0.9940 0.00 0.00 0.00 -25.65
xxxxx7747 d7 t73 sell 0.42 p3 0.9792 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t74 0.9777 0.00 0.00 0.00 -63.00
xxxxx7748 d7 t73 sell 0.60 p2 1.5910 0.0000 0.0000 d7 t74 1.5904 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00


2 trades that day were short, 25-30 min each but it will do :-) what the system is good for - the drawdown (max DD) is small - about 0.1-1% of deposit...

 
Rorschach:
Let me give you a kiss.)) Maybe you'll find "If you suppose to bring the research to the problem of absorbing walls" out of simple unnecessary stuff too.

Are you kidding me? ((((((
 
Aleksander:

The system is good - the drawdown (max DD) is small - about 0.1-1% of the deposit...

So, it's time to put it into an Expert Advisor and put it into people's hands, let them...

And the profit of % of the deposit ...

Not interesting.

 
mama ama kriminal)
 
Promokash:
mama ama kriminal)
Mama AK kriminal)
 
Kocty2:
Alternatively, the probability theory can be considered not relative to the probability of occurrence of increments relative to each other from the distribution. But with respect to their probabilities of occurrence over time for each class of increments separately.


The main reason is that sometimes a large company uses time instead of trades, they create trades and a vector, and the speculators make trades around this vector.

The question is how best to identify this vector, because it can fluctuate unpredictably within a vector, but there should be limiters.

It is possible that the arrangement of checkpoints is better judged by time rather than by movement.

The trade is linked to the fundamentals, which are tied to decisions and so on.

it might be better to look at the distribution of each individual change in time.....

in short, we need to look at how to identify those points where tensions have built up and price has crept up to a constraint that will force it to stay within certain bounds.

By the way, the probabilities are good here, because if the price has exhausted its limit of chaotic move up or down, it will either stop and shake it near the boundary or turn around.

 
Promokash:

Are you kidding me? ((((((

No
 

I liked your idea of "storage" channel (like absorbing walls). I've been talking about it for a long time, both in and out, and through DTF, and through terver.

I'll throw a deleted Roche quote, it's like a capacitor or a capacitor system with charging potentials too (like diode feeding, by the way).


http://forum.viac.ru/viewtopic.php?p=59560&sid=7a0825e5f0a2b82d8cb5d323e2b3364b

"Have read with interest what little there is here on the Harry trader. Didn't get it right away, but then suddenly remembered physics.
You may laugh, but if you take a model of capacitor and start periodically feeding current with certain frequency, it will also periodically charge (increase potential at its inputs) in one direction and then in another. This explains a little bit about the flat mode. Further, the differential equations he applied were mentioned here. So, the current (capital flow) is just expressed through diffusions from the voltage (instrument price), with the voltage (price) always having a lag in phase with the current (capital flow). This also explains why the Big Money Men (MM) cannot jack up the price indefinitely - leakage current appears."

 
Promokash:

I liked your "storage" channel. I've been talking about it for a long time, both in and out, and through DTF, and through terver.

I'll throw in a deleted Roche quote, it's the same (as diode is fed by the way) as a capacitor or a capacitor system with potentials accumulation.

the 'synchrophasotron' is forgotten, it talks like it should!
Reason: