I think a fixed lot in a martin is a market that is simultaneously no bigger than a constant (for example 0,1), you can relate a share of capital to the entire capital for a certain time period
YOUNGA: I think the fixed lot in martin is in the market simultaneously not more than a constant (for example 0,1), you can relate the share of capital to the entire capital for a certain time interval
It doesn't make any sense. Explain in more detail...
Flew past a hundred - flight was normal. Clear exit (optimised parameters half a year ago in two, two and a half years) on the take (green lines and arrows), start and end of the rollover cycle with exit to profit (red vertical lines):
If you are interested of course, for example you have a start lot = 0.1, when you want to double the strategy in the tester again open 0.1 lot, if you open in the opposite direction - also -0.1 (ie the entire base strategy is the sum of strategies equal to the number of martingale shares)
If you are interested of course, for example, you have in the martin start lot = 0.1, when you want to double the strategy in the tester again open 0.1 lot, if you open in the opposite direction - also -0.1 (ie the whole strategy is the sum of base strategies equal to the number of martingale shares)
Then we need a significant pullback at opening the next averaging in the illan (reversal - in martin) of the instrument price to take a profit of the whole order stack.
This is what I have implemented variants of flips/averaging for optimization in the tester:
externint VAR_MM = 0; // используемый вариант MM в соотв-ии:// 0 = множитель с числами ФИБО; // 1 - по Илану в соответствие с LotExponent // 2 - классический мартин - удвоение предыдущего объема// 3 - мн по ар-ой прогрессии // 4 - мартин по схеме домножения пред-предыдущего объёма на 2, т.е. 1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,24,32
In the picture above, the exp is working according to option 4.
Not in this case, not the strategy of pumping - I thus want to assess the profitability of the strategy - if you work out 0.1 lot from 10000$ - this is one return, if after 32 entries of 0.1 (3.2 lots / 10000$) is a different return (I hate myself that I can not convey such a primitive idea)
YOUNGA: Not in this case, not the strategy of pumping - I thus want to assess the profitability of the strategy - if you work out 0.1 lot from 10000$ - this is one return, if after 32 entries of 0.1 (3.2 lots / 10000$) is a different return (I hate myself that I can not convey such a primitive idea)
lot variable but started with 0.1 (20% of capital) with a start-up capital of $500
obviously with the same number of trades different returns
I see what you mean. I mean how do you imagine adding or averaging with a constant lot in order to get a series of orders to profit with ILAN or MARTIN?
Or is it a different strategy not related to flips/diversions as in ilan-martin?
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
I think the fixed lot in martin is in the market simultaneously not more than a constant (for example 0,1), you can relate the share of capital to the entire capital for a certain time interval
It doesn't make any sense. Explain in more detail...
Flew past a hundred - flight was normal. Clear exit (optimised parameters half a year ago in two, two and a half years) on the take (green lines and arrows), start and end of the rollover cycle with exit to profit (red vertical lines):
It doesn't make any sense. Explain more...
If you are interested of course, for example you have a start lot = 0.1, when you want to double the strategy in the tester again open 0.1 lot, if you open in the opposite direction - also -0.1 (ie the entire base strategy is the sum of strategies equal to the number of martingale shares)
If you are interested of course, for example, you have in the martin start lot = 0.1, when you want to double the strategy in the tester again open 0.1 lot, if you open in the opposite direction - also -0.1 (ie the whole strategy is the sum of base strategies equal to the number of martingale shares)
Then we need a significant pullback at opening the next averaging in the illan (reversal - in martin) of the instrument price to take a profit of the whole order stack.
This is what I have implemented variants of flips/averaging for optimization in the tester:
In the picture above, the exp is working according to option 4.
Not in this case, not the strategy of pumping - I thus want to assess the profitability of the strategy - if you work out 0.1 lot from 10000$ - this is one return, if after 32 entries of 0.1 (3.2 lots / 10000$) is a different return (I hate myself that I can not convey such a primitive idea)
for example a fixed lot 0,1 started with 10000
lot variable but started from 0,1 (20% of capital) with start-up capital 500$
obviously with the same number of trades different profitability
for example a fixed lot 0,1 started with 10000
lot variable but started with 0.1 (20% of capital) with a start-up capital of $500
obviously with the same number of trades different returns
I see what you mean. I mean how do you imagine adding or averaging with a constant lot in order to get a series of orders to profit with ILAN or MARTIN?
Or is it a different strategy not related to flips/diversions as in ilan-martin?
I've downloaded something here that seems to be on the subject...
I won't be able to find it in the rubble later.