Humour - page 143
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What version of the droid do you have?
Hitler himself was a harmless man, strange as it may seem. It was his subordinates who did this - hundreds of thousands of subordinates of different ranks and stripes. It is not necessary to blame on one person what almost all country did, and not only it, there were also accomplices.
Yes, of course, Hitler and Napoleon and Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan were all great and harmless. And all the trouble was caused by their inferiors. Just a question: would history have changed if they had not been there?
Of course, Hitler and Napoleon, Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan were all great and harmless. And it was their subordinates who did all the damage.
The warlords were white and fluffy. That is why victories are attributed to them and all sorts of outrages to their subordinates. How else can one become a great military leader if he does not look for those who are responsible for the defeats? After all, only winners are not judged.
For example, it was not Napoleon who defected from Russia, but his subordinates. They just forgot to throw Napoleon out of the cart in a hurry, where he was sleeping unawares. So it happened that the Frog army stayed in Russia and Napoleon ended up in Paris.
Why isn't it related? Very related. Most of the programmers here turn out to be radio technicians, for some reason unknown to me. Although, I can guess what.
Besides, do you know what the Grail is? It's something reminiscent of something that was invented long ago in radio engineering. Something that involves both an oscillating circuit and a rectifier.
And Hitler has a lot to do with our case, too.
It's very simple: circuitry is programming in hardware, and vice versa.
Vladimir, you are very knowledgeable. How do you increase the concentration of alcohol without distilling it?
By adding CaO, which uses the water in solution to react.
Inorganic chemistry textbooks to the rescue.
Hitler himself was a harmless man, strange as it may seem. It was his subordinates who did this - hundreds of thousands of subordinates of different ranks and stripes. It is not necessary to blame on one person what almost all country did, and not only it, there were also accomplices.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Эксперимент_Милгрэма
и
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Стэнфордский_тюремный_эксперимент
Somewhere obedience, somewhere the concept of "second class people".
And the bulk of the population turns into sadists.
The same way 100% alcohol is obtained.
By adding CaO, Which uses the available water in solution to react.
Inorganic chemistry textbooks to help you.
Thanks, but I've already studied all the inorganic and organic chemistry textbooks. The problem is that a small amount of Ca(OH)2 remains in solution (slightly soluble), and this is an alkali, the presence of which is unacceptable in foodstuffs. This hydroxide can be removed by distillation or by the addition of a precipitating agent such as sulphuric acid. However, excessive amounts of sulphuric acid are also harmful.
Any other ideas besides centrifugation and freezing?