The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 213

 
JImpro:
It is ok if you find a market/instrument with stable H-volatility greater than two.

What is H-volatility?
 
JImpro:
Suitable if you can find a market/instrument with a stable H-volatility greater than two.

Look at the Russian stock market
 
vasabu2012:

What is H-volatility?

It's all described in detail here, there are even two Grails (without the quotes). One TS for markets with H<2 ("flat"), the other for H>2 ("trend"). If H=2, nothing will help you. I mean on such an instrument, the MTS with positive mathematical expectation cannot be built. (Without using additional information)

Stanislav Pastukhov "About some probabilistic-statistical methods in technical analysis" (pdf)
PhD thesis
2004

http://forex.kbpauk.ru/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=math&Number=142956&Searchpage=2&Main=142956&Words=%C4%E8%F1%F1%E5%F0%F2%E0%F6%E8%FF+%CF%E0%F1%F2%F3%F5%EE%E2%E0&topic=&Search=true#Post142956

 
Have you personally used these grails in real trade?
 
vasabu2012:
Have you personally used these grails in real trading?


You should start a branch and write what you want.

The branch is from the Automaton, after all. He gives the answers here.

 
vasabu2012:
Have you personally used these grails in real trade?
No, I have my own. But it's pure mathematics, if H-volatility is different from 2, the TS from this dissertation will be profitable, no doubt about it. All formulas are there, you can even calculate profitability without testing. The only thing left is to find the right instruments for these TS.
 

Growing up little by little ;)

.


.

Right here ---> http://forum.roboforex.ru/showthread.php?t=11096

.

more details on the beech --->

 
avtomat:

Growing up little by little ;)

.

.

Right here ---> https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://forum.roboforex.ru/showthread.php?t=11096

.

more details on the beech ---> https://www.mql5.com

didn't find 255%.

82 - saw

 
_new-rena:

not found 255%

82 - saw


  • Increase: +154.84%
 
avtomat:

  • Increase: +154.84%

yep, yep!

Reason: