The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 386
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Experiment.
Competition:
start 01.12.2018.
finish 31.12.2018.
I set a goal:
To increase the starting deposit by 100 times.
And preferably without losing trades ;)
I'd like to have a competition, too :-) It's a bit boring on New Year's Eve...
in 100 of course not, but with the hands of 2-3 multiples seems real
PS/ for some reason there are no contests/competitions as a class in the local anthill now
Thank you!
And if the conditions are a little simpler and at the same time clear of excitement,
by opening and closing solely in single lots and obtaining
themaximum achievable result in each trade?
I'd like to have a competition, too :-) It's a bit boring on New Year's Eve...
Not at 100, of course, but with the hands of 2-3 kratas seems realistic.
PS/ for some reason the local ant hill is now missing contests/competitions as a class
Contests - it's a very useful thing, if you approach them wisely.
And if the conditions are made a little simpler and, at the same time, clear of gambling,
By opening and closing solely in single lots and obtaining
themaximum achievable result in each trade?
Those are different conditions. Significantly different.
First, such restrictions (1 lot) knowingly do not allow to win the competition, where other participants do not have such restrictions, or as in this case, maxLot=50.
Secondly, what isthe "maximum achievable" result? It will be different for different TFs. And in many cases it will be contrary to the main objective.
Contests are a very useful thing if you approach them wisely.
Upload a story for 3 months to the tester, that's your competition.) In 5-10 m you know what place you won.
Upload a 3-month history to the tester, that's your competition.) In 5-10m you know what place you won.
it's not that... it's artificial... it's inanimate... it's a doll...
that's not what... it's artificial... it's inanimate... it's a doll...
If the testing is different from the real - screw the tester and finally admit that it's no good at all.
If testing is equivalent to reals, the real is only needed to finally check the ATS capability - it takes a few days and a dozen trades. And then the ATC may be set free to graze. I.e., everything is alive and there is no difference.
All that remains is to choose an option)).
Upload a 3-month history to the tester, that's your competition.) In 5-10m you know what place you won.
it's like: take a "rubber woman" and in 5-10 min...:-)
I can't drink that much...
it's like: take a "rubber woman" and after 5-10 minutes...:-)
I can't drink that much...
Well, you, dear boy, have associations)).
Mary Ivanovna shows a brick to the children in class and asks:
- Vovochka, what are you thinking about when you look at this brick?
- About sissies, Mary Ivanovna.
- Vovochka, why about women?
- I always think about them.
If the testing differs from the real - screw the tester and finally admit that it is useless.
If testing is equivalent to real trading, then the real is only needed for the final check of the ATS capability - that's a few days and a dozen trades. And then the ATC may be released for free grazing. I.e., everything is alive and there is no difference.
All that remains is to choose the option)).
I pissed it off about 10-15 years ago, or maybe even more, I don't remember.
Testing has NEVER been and will never be equivalent to the real thing. It's impossible in principle.
SO
And the analogy with the "rubber woman" in this case is very appropriate.