[Archive! - page 210

New comment
 
On the other hand, if it's not a multi-track operation, it's even worse. The authorities are not in control of shit.
 
Mischek:
On the other hand, if it's not a multi-track, it's even worse. The authorities are not in control of shit.
It is not a multi-track operation. Surkov will be reprimanded by Putin for sloppy work, and Prokhorov will get massive inspections of all his structures. And we will still sit in the same shit, because we can no longer be seen at all. We are all the adopted children of the glazier.
 
granit77:
This is not a multi-track. Surkov will get a reprimand from Putin for sloppy work, and Prokhorov will get a massive inspection of all his structures. And we will remain in the same shit, because we are no longer visible. We are all the adopted children of the glazier.


Surkov creatively ran out a long time ago. Keeping him on threatens big shakes, lowering both Putin's rating and that of the Authority as a system. Power cannot but have a sense of self-preservation.

The next question is with whom did Prokhorov have the contract? Certainly not with Surkov. If there is a breach of contract, there will be a shortage of suitcases in the shops.

He is a dumb sheep so that in this situation, he would have to dump Prokhorov and not Surkov.

Well, I am kind of hoping for a multi-track)).

 
granit77:
.... And we'll still be sitting in the same shit because we're no longer visible. We're all the glazier's stepchildren.


That's how we live....

A hotelier in Kuban fought off 15 bandits...

Investigators will find out if the hotelier exceeded the limits of acceptable self-defence by wounding three armed robbers as part of an ongoing investigation.

 
PapaYozh:

The whole thing looked so out of the ordinary that it immediately became the top news story of the day and literally blew up the internet - .

---

===============

"Such a blow the great combiner

has not received in a long time..."

 
Mischek:

...You'd have to be a dumb sheep to leak Prokhorov and not Surkov in this situation.

I'm kind of hoping for a multi-track approach ))

Who are you calling stupid sheep? They don't respect the government at all...

WATCH TONIGHT'S "WRONG CAUSE" PROGRAMME ON NTV ABOUT BILLIONAIRE PROKHOROV AND BANDIT ROIZMAN!!!
 
First this bastard steals his country and then he publicly declares that Russia's economy is not efficient, that we should start working 16 hours a day and live within our means, simplify labour laws and give employers the right to be disenfranchised, saying that then the efficiency will increase. And you want to vote for that? What kind of opposition is that? Sell your vote to the aligarchs? It's time for Prokhorov to go to jail, and for a long time, because his friend Hodor is getting bored.
 
C-4:
First this bastard steals his country and then he publicly declares that Russia's economy is not efficient, that we should start working 16 hours a day and live within our means, simplify labour laws and give employers the right to be disenfranchised, saying that then the efficiency will increase. And you want to vote for that? What kind of opposition is that? Sell your vote to the aligarchs? It's time for Prokhorov to go to jail, and for a long time, because his friend Hodor is getting bored.
All right, but "this scoundrel" is small potatoes compared to those who are systematically robbing our country. That is why he will be whacked, not as an oligarch, but as a competitor in stealing from the country.
I will not vote for the systemic thieves and crooks so as not to help them get rid of their competitors. Better to vote for any of their real opponents, even Zyuganov or Prokhorov. The only condition is that my vote must reach the Duma, so there is no point in scorning it for the non-passers, regardless of convictions.
 

I don't think it's a good idea to vote for the greater evil in order to shut up the lesser evil. A healthy political system requires parity, and there is none. Everything is in the hands of the Party. Unfortunately I have to admit that ER is more adequate than others in its election campaign and takes into account (at least it is declared) the interests of a broader mass of people. Personally I do not know who to give my vote to in order to create parity. The communists? The aligarchs? The party of penitents? The moderate nationalists? Which one can represent my interests?

But don't forget that the idea of the "Party of Thieves and Crooks" has again been imposed on society by the "opposition" behind which are not exactly transparent people. How are some better than others? Rather, the UR resembles a kind of Masonic lodge, with all that it implies.

 
granit77:

....... I will not vote for the system thieves and crooks so as not to help them get rid of their rivals. I'd rather vote for any of their real opponents, even Zyuganov or Prokhorov. The only condition is that my vote must reach the Duma, so there is no point in scorning it for the non-passers, regardless of convictions.
If you "enter" compromising information on Zyuganov into a search engine, there will be a lot of websites with information of a certain direction... Here's an excerpt from the text, the most decent of the many...... The fact is that, contrary to widespread opinion, the CPRF's financial foundation does not come from membership fees. That may have been the case at first. In '93, the revenue side of the Communist budget was less than 13 million rubles. However, the next year, after Burchenko's accession, the CPRF's income jumped to 128 million rubles. Now, 90 percent of the CPRF's income comes from so-called sympathizers. That is, from those heads of enterprises and banks, who for various reasons either consciously consider it necessary or are forced to sponsor the CPRF. It is a particularly lucrative time on the eve of parliamentary elections. There are always plenty of businessmen who have not previously been seen in the party, but want to get on the CPRF list. But only those who were able to convince Kuptsov or Burchenko of their generosity are destined to become deputies. In 1999, Zyuganov was allowed to sneak economist Sergey Glazyev and physician Ashot Sarkisyan into the Duma. According to the latter, who was soon forced to leave the faction: 'Gennady Andreevich decides nothing there. Zyuganov promised him the post of head of the committee, but did not keep his word because of Kuptsov's opposition. There was also a known case when Gennady Andreyevich, who wanted to exceed his allotted quota, was told by Kuptsov right at the plenum:

- Lists approved, issue closed...... Politics is like forex, by the time you find a trend (a worthy politician), it's too late...))
1...203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217...707
New comment