The returns for the last nine months! :) - page 10

New comment
 
Max747:

Believe me, you won't see anything good in it, only more criticism! :)
Sometimes criticism can be useful. Are you afraid that someone will be able to figure out the Expert Advisor's algorithm using the report? Yes, it is virtually impossible. You need a detailed report to be able to tell for sure if there will be real profit or not.
 
Techno:
Sometimes criticism can be useful. Are you afraid that someone will be able to figure out the Expert Advisor's algorithm using the report? Yes, it is virtually impossible. You need a detailed report to be able to say for sure if there will be real profit or not.

Wouldn't the demo score show us that? ))

In my opinion, this is a sure thing!

 
Max747:

Wouldn't the demo score show us that? ))
It will. But you will have to wait for a week to see the profit)). And so, the report will tell us at once what we can expect, what are the chances.
 
Techno:
It will show. But you'll have to wait a week to find out the profits for the week))) But the report will tell you what you can count on and what the chances are.

I'd rather sit in the DEMO... ))

At least I'll have the confidence of an expert! ;) So, let's wait! ))

 

Max47, if you downloaded this Expert Advisor from the internet, you should at least show the link to it, and you don't have to give your own algorithm.

http://www.fx4u.ru/rinki-forex-commodities-cfd-futures-f14/yazik-programmirovaniya-mql4-opisanie-mts-skrip-f16/sovetnik-woc015-t13044.html

https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9797

 
sergeev:

Max47, if you downloaded this Expert Advisor from the Internet, you should at least show the link to it. And you don't have to give us your algorithm.

http://www.fx4u.ru/rinki-forex-commodities-cfd-futures-f14/yazik-programmirovaniya-mql4-opisanie-mts-skrip-f16/sovetnik-woc015-t13044.html

https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9797



Yes this EA was taken as the basis. But I have completely reworked it!

What is the point of posting links?

 
philips:

...I'm not very good with terms, and I think Matemat already wrote about it (as it seemed to me in terms :))) - my mistake may be that takes and stops are placed inside the bar and if you have a net of bars with stops and the bar is white, the robot takes them as profitable without losses, but in reality (in reality, during that trading session) price may have first gone for stops and only then went up, to draw a white candle:)

Somehow:)

That's the way it is. This is the technology of in-bar tester grails. And Max doesn't have the coolest example yet.

Here is such a tester grail for the same reason left me without a villa and a yacht. Permanent lot 0.1. On the demo a total loss, and not because of requotes or spreads at all.

 

Nice chart... But I've already understood that the prettier it is, the worse the EA is on the real market. )

And the quality of modelling is not very good.

 
Max747:

Nice chart... But I've already understood that the prettier it is, the worse the EA is on the real market. )

And the quality of modelling is not very good.


When testing on m1 the quality of testing is always 25%
 
Max747:

Nice chart... But I've already understood that the prettier it is, the worse the EA is on the real market. )

And the quality of modelling is not very good.

It usually is. And in minutes the modelling quality cannot be higher than 25% in principle.
1...3456789101112131415161718
New comment