You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There's no balance in MT, there isn't.
What's written above the column is a joke, at best it's a picture of you borrowing something and putting it in your wallet and taking a picture.
You may or may not have a hundred times the amount you owe, but you can't see the debt in your wallet.
but you can see everything in one number - Funds, aka equity, aka balance, real, accounting, true, final, armour.
The bojang goes on. The imperishable loc. :-D)))
The "unallocated" financial result - that's how the market "manages" it! If you allow it. ;)
The talent of the trader (not the example of Netrebkin's online fins) to turn "-" into "+".
This is what the topic of the topic was originally about, and Orlov's remarks about taking a stop loss on the balance and "undistribution" of this take - on the lot.
Many have faced (and there are whole threads on the forum about optimal ratios) the problem of choosing the right stoploss.
As I see it, for the short term, i.e. if swaps can be neglected, the locking discussed can be useful.
The change in the order of the parts... for real "maestros" :) - nothing will change.
;)
There's no balance in MT, there isn't.
What's written above the column is a joke, at best it's a picture of you borrowing something and putting it in your wallet and taking a picture.
You may or may not have a hundred times the amount you owe, but you can't see the debt in your wallet.
but you can see everything in one number - Funds, aka equity, aka balance, real, accounting, true, final, armour.
You start trading when your balance is 0. How do you do it? Plz.
Equity is the consequence, Profit/Loss is the cause, Balance is the fulcrum, the starting point... No anchor, you fall...
You start trading when your balance is 0. How do you do it? Plz.
I don't get it ?
The bojang goes on. The imperishable loc. :-D)))
The "unallocated" financial result - that's how the market "manages" it! If you let it. ;)
The talent of the trader (not the example of Netrebkin's online fins) to turn "-" into "+".
This is what the topic of the topic was originally about, and Orlov's remarks about taking a stop loss on the balance and "undistribution" of this take - on the lot.
Many have faced (and there are whole threads on the forum about optimal ratios) the problem of choosing the right stoploss.
As I see it, for the short term, i.e. if swaps can be neglected, the locking discussed can be useful.
The change in the order of the parts... for real "maestros" :) - nothing will change.
;)
Equity is the consequence, Profit/Loss is the cause, Balance is the point of reference... If you don't have a footing, you fall...
A philosophical debate, like "the egg and the chicken, which comes first?"
Piglet's right - we should get out of here!
;)
This is no longer an argument about loca, but about the primacy of equity and balance.
Base and superstructure!
Bravo!
;)
A philosophical debate, like "the egg and the chicken, which comes first?"
Piglet's right, we should get out of here!
;)
You have a broken causal link....
I don't know what other irregularities you see in me :-D, but that's not what was originally discussed.
Militant theorists argued that lock is evil.
Then it turned out that this is a "gimmick" of mt4. in mt5 everything will be more transparent.
;)