"The 'perfect' trading system - page 56
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The price of the tool is computer code.
Bullshit.
Bullshit.
Delirious is delirious :)
However, try to prove that what you have drawn on your terminal chart as a price is not computer code :)
Agree that I can draw the exact same price chart on the wall with a mirror and a sunburst from it.
Is anyone willing to attribute properties such as mass, inertia, momentum, etc. to the sunbeam?
Nonsense is nonsense :)
However, try to prove that what you draw on the chart in the terminal as a price is not computer code :)
Agree that I can draw the exact same price chart on the wall with a mirror and a sun bunny from it.
Is anyone willing to attribute properties such as mass, inertia, momentum, etc. to the sunbeam?
A mirror has inertia, so the sunbeam has inertia. That's one. Secondly, it's not mechanical inertia that's being explained to you here.
Are you tired, Alexei? :))
[...]It's not about your arguments and terminology, after all.
I got the answer I needed (although it's obvious from the code):
Adaptive EA and OTT lack the concept of "analytics/analysis".
Fine, let the man get the right number of bumps on his forehead from the standard rake, if that's what he needs. The process of learning is illogical, especially if it involves money. And what he will call this process, OTT or otherwise, is up to him.
I myself am currently constructing yet another sophisticated rake to rack up a critical mass of bumps on my forehead. So far, arguments from smart people have not helped me much. I have to go through this process myself. Full stop.
"What's your address?" - "www.leningrad.spb.ru".
P.S. By the way, VictorArt, in fact Svinozavr only suggested that your system is based on mythical inertia of the price. And you with ardour began to prove to all others, that it has no price (they say, nasty Svinozavr attributed it to the price). Who are you arguing with?
However, try to prove that what you draw on the chart in the terminal as a price is not computer code :)
What I have drawn on my chart is an ordered set of real numbers, which is obtained by observing some complex system.
I may be beginning to understand you though. "Wake up, Neo! The Matrix has you.", isn't it? :D
However, try to prove that what you have drawn on the chart in the terminal as a price is not computer code :)
I can draw exactly the same price chart on the wall with a mirror and a sunbeam from it.
Is anyone prepared to attribute properties such as mass, inertia, momentum, etc. to a sun bunny?
I don't think you should be touching on physics and mathematics. Everything you've written on the subject here on the forum is child's play.
I could sufficiently substantiate that statement, but my experience with you shows that you are insensitive to what the person you are talking to says. And your reactions are not quite adequate.
Apparently the theories that are formulated in more than one sentence just don't fit in your head.
But you don't need them. You create your own "theories". Like this one:
You know, like this: "General Trading Theory (GTT): To make a profit, you should trade your own function in sync with the market." all GTT, i.e. all 100%.
Truly, everything is brilliantly simple !
I got the answer I needed (although it's obvious from the code):
Fine, let the man get the right number of bumps on his forehead from the standard rake, if that's what he needs. The process of learning is illogical, especially if it involves money. And what he will call this process, OTT or otherwise, is up to him.
I myself am currently constructing yet another sophisticated rake to rack up a critical mass of bumps on my forehead. So far, arguments from smart people have not helped me much. I have to go through this process myself. Full stop.
"What's your address?" - "www.leningrad.spb.ru".
P.S. By the way, VictorArt, in fact Svinozavr only assumed that your system is based on a mythical inertia of the price. And you ardently began to prove to all the others that the price doesn't have it (say, disgusting Svinozavr attributed it to the price). Who are you arguing with?
I'm not arguing with anyone, I'm voicing my point of view on the matter.
If someone wants to attribute mechanical properties to the price, let them. At least there will be something to discuss on forums.
I got the answer I needed (although it's obvious from the code):
Fine, let the man get the right number of bumps on his forehead from the standard rake, if that's what he needs. The process of learning is illogical, especially if it involves money. And what he will call this process, OTT or otherwise, is up to him.
I myself am currently constructing yet another sophisticated rake for the critical mass of bumps on my forehead. So far, arguments from smart people have not helped me much. I have to go through this process myself. Point....
I actually wanted to save you time by pointing out your opponent's inadequacies in the form of light banter. I have a fair amount of respect for your personal rake.