"The 'perfect' trading system - page 57
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A mirror has inertia, so the sunbeam has it too. This is one. Secondly, you are being told about a different inertia here, not about mechanical inertia.
A sunbeam as a coherent physical object does not exist - it is a set of bright spots, each of which does not move.
The movement of the sunbeam, as a moving image, occurs only in our minds - the illusion of movement.
The sunbeam is a code used by the human brain to encode this intangible object.
In relation to a computer it is a computer code.
What I draw on my graph is an ordered set of real numbers, which is obtained by observing some complex system.
Perhaps I'm beginning to understand you, though. "Wake up, Neo! The Matrix has you.", isn't it? :D
No, it isn't.
Matter is material, illusions are illusory :)
I mean, it's good not to confuse the real movement of material objects, with the illusory movement of prices.
I mean, it is good not to confuse real movement of material objects, with illusory price movement.
Why is price movement illusory? It is material because it is directly related to the movement of masses of money (from somewhere and to somewhere) - it is both a consequence and a cause of it. Isn't it?
I don't think you should be touching on physics and mathematics. Everything you have written on the subject here on this forum is child's play.
I could sufficiently substantiate that statement, but my experience with you is that you are insensitive to what the other person is saying. And your reactions are not quite adequate.
Apparently the theories that are formulated in more than one sentence just don't fit in your head.
But you don't need them. You create your own "theories". Like this one:
"Everything is genius, indeed!
Have we only spoken to you in this thread or elsewhere?
About being insensitive to what the other person is saying, I agree. Why should I agree with something I don't agree with?
If you want adequacy, buy a 'head-nodding' netsuke and communicate with it - it will agree with you all the time :)
Other than that, if you don't agree with my theory, prove me wrong. Why stoop to direct insults against me?
I have absolutely no business what you think about me, so spare your time - spend it on something more useful.
Why is price movement illusory? It is material because it is directly related to the movement of money masses (from somewhere and to somewhere) - it is both a consequence and a cause of it. Isn't it?
The movement of masses of money was when money was material objects, like gold coins.
Nowadays, money is a computer code - that sunshine bunny.
To say that "the movement of the price is material" is like saying "the movement of cartoons on a TV screen is material" - you know that the drawn pictures don't move anywhere - the frames change - the illusion of movement appears to the observer.
Anyway, we've already digressed from the topic. I've said enough about illusions of motion.
The movement of money was then when money was material objects, such as gold coins.
Nowadays, money is computer code - that sunny bunny.
To say that "the movement of the price is material" is like saying "the movement of cartoons on a TV screen is material" - you know that the drawn pictures don't move anywhere - the frames change - the illusion of movement appears to the observer.
In general, we have already digressed from the topic. I've said enough about illusions of motion.
However, try to prove that we are not computer code.....))))
You are a computer code to me :)
After all, I have absolutely no way of verifying with whom I am communicating, with the person Leonid, with the person impersonating Leonid or with the computer program impersonating the person Leonid.
You are a computer code to me :)
I have absolutely no way of verifying with whom I am communicating, with the person Leonid, with the person impersonating Leonid or with the computer program impersonating the person Leonid.
I agree. Therefore you are also a computer code. And computer code from computer code is a fitting.
Fighting the matrix is practically useless.....)))))
You are a computer code to me :)
After all, I have absolutely no way of verifying with whom I am communicating, with the person Leonid, with the person impersonating Leonid or with the computer program impersonating the person Leonid.
The main thing is what does it matter with whom you communicate, whether with software or man, the essence that each side brings to it, what goals it sets and by what methods it solves them? Everybody saw me conducting experiments with deduction on forum (may be not always be exact, but it's just an entertainment) the main point is that the certain object can be recognized even in disguise of many nicks, hence the morality structure remains the same and this structure adds something and by this informational interaction it is possible not only to calculate the structure, but also to track its actions in the past and to predict its future behavior, what we all try to do only in respect to quotations.
The main thing is the essence of the communication between the parties, what are the goals they set and what methods are used to reach them. The essence is that the certain object can be found out even through the mask of many nicks, hence the morality structure remains the same and this structure adds something and by this informational interaction it is possible not only to calculate the structure, but also to trace its actions in the past and to assume its future behaviour, what we all try to do only in respect to quotations.
In fact, that's what I wrote above:
"Adaptive EA deals with computer codes. Of course, it cannot know where they come from and where they go.
General Trading Theory (GTT) is also completely abstracted from the nature of price creation."
We do not know where the price comes from, so the "essence of the price" can only be "deduced" from its "traces" - the "sunbeams" that we have on our monitor screen in the form of a price chart.