
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
By the way, why can't you use this principle for multicurrency?
For EURUSD: If ∆GBPUSD is down, etc.
How's that? Explain....
It doesn't matter which constant to use, as long as it is a constant.
But mathematical calculations will be much simpler if the constant is 0 rather than 1 (or some other value other than zero).
+1
It doesn't matter which constant to use, as long as it is a constant.
But mathematical calculations would be greatly simplified if the constant was 0 rather than 1 (or some other non-zero value).
.Interesting method, what if "zeroing out" PI/speed of light/gravity would be a new word not just in maths and physics...
... ...that would definitely make EVERYTHING easier.
+10
.Interesting method, what if "zeroing in" on PI/speed of light/gravity would be a new word not just in maths and physics...
... It would definitely make EVERYTHING simpler.
+10
You are trying to twist the essence of what you are saying. I can tell you that you can also zero out the speed of light, but then the speed of your car would be negative, what difference would it make?
For your better understanding I will give you the example of temperature. Does the fact that Celsius "0" does not coincide with absolute zero (Kelvin) make something not count?
.Interesting method, what if "zeroing in" on PI/speed of light/gravity would be a new word not just in maths and physics...
... It would definitely make EVERYTHING simpler.
+10
And second. Why in the right part of the equation should be one and not 2, not 2.13 etc.? What is the reason for choosing one?
You are trying to twist the essence of what you are saying. I can tell you that you can also zero out the speed of light, but then the speed of your car will be negative
Hit me again, I haven't laughed like that in a long time.
+20
Hit me again, I haven't laughed like that in a long time.
+20
You somehow ignored the Celsius example, your blindness must be selective.
You somehow ignored the Celsius example, your blindness must be selective.
Sorry to keep you waiting (couldn't suppress a fit of laughter).
What, as of now, 1 inch = 1 cm ? ... or is it 0 ?
Sorry to keep you waiting (I couldn't help myself having a fit of laughter).
What, as of now 1 inch = 1 cm ? or is it 0 ?
What do inches and centimetres have to do with it ? You rejected the possibility of changing the scale by moving the zero value, I gave the temperature example. The same can be done with other scales. I'm not going to support the flubbing further, sorry.
I just made the same idea, but instead of using MA to determine delta, I used CCI
Unfortunately, now for the correct display of the indicator the history of all 6 pairs for the selected timeframe is needed