>> yes, I wrote a little bit about it in the phisophian aspect.
Write a little more, please.
Namely, what kind of addiction did you find?
p.s. At the same time a question to all present - have you observed a correlation between timeframe increase and percentage of correct predictions. It would be very interesting to know.
the fifth day of testing the weekly forecast:
Colleagues, does your forecasting quality depend on scale (timeframe) ?
Yes, I wrote a little about it in the fisophone aspect
Gentlemen, I look at our screenshots and...open.
Sergei's weekly forecast has the tail up, Oleg's extrapolator also looks up and I have a general move up, I emphasize, general
but, I also have room to move to the "strong" 4250 and the less strong 4220 and Vladimir's forecast shows just at 4220 (+-)
Anyway, my point is that the group opinion.... is strong!
(I finished my thought in a weird way...I wanted to write something clever and that clever thing ran away ^_^)
GRNN's past prediction:
New:
Right on target! >> Congratulations.
The final result of testing the forecast within 5 days.
Taki is back :o)
The final result of testing the prediction within 5 days.
It's back :o)
and you said, "why?"
we need to make this model in mql, we definitely do.
And you said, "why?"
>> we should do this model in mql, we should do it in mql.
I will translate it in the long run. first we need to increase the "resolution", I think we can do that with probabilistic networks.
>> yes, I wrote a little bit about it in the phisophian aspect.
Write a little more, please.
Namely, what kind of addiction did you find?
p.s. At the same time a question to all present - have you observed a correlation between timeframe increase and percentage of correct predictions. It would be very interesting to know.