EA N7S_AO_772012 - page 15

 
goldtrader писал(а) >>

Shooter, can you trust that kind of modelling quality in tick-testing? :

Simulation quality

n/a

Timeline mismatch errors

100456

You can't, of course, and you can.

It all depends on what you are testing and how you are optimizing.

This EA has rather blurred inputs, the most basic calculations are done on one TF only, the rest are not sensitive at all and only at bar close, SL is optimized in 10 increments. So IMHO it is not critical for mismatch errors, in fact it is essentially a difference of a couple of pips and a little by volume of smaller and higher TFs. There are special scripts that show it and even correct it.

I used different quotes with different "roaches", i.e. different quality and errors. The difference is at most 10%.

(Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it is.)

P.S. And why when you type stutters and stutters letters swallow.

 

Sets of 8 pairs. For a version with a hooter. For the 4 digit version. I myself sit on forex4you.

Personally I think that trawl is needed. And in tests it shows the best results on a combat week. Once again I will repeat that. Try to run the previous week with trawl in optimizer with previous sets...

Files:
set.rar  5 kb
 

While sleeping at night the terminal crashed at 10 open positions, on restarting it started to swear:

09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 USDCHF,M5: zero divide
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 USDCHF,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 GBPUSD,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 AUDUSD,M5: zero divide
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 AUDUSD,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 EURGBP,M5: zero divide
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 EURGBP,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 EURJPY,M5: zero divide
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 EURJPY,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 GBPJPY,M5: initialized
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 USDCAD,M5: zero divide
09:36:24 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 USDCAD,M5: initialized
09:36:29 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 EURUSD,M5: initialized
09:36:29 N7S_AO_772012_L7_2 USDJPY,M5: initialized

 

I ran it on micro reals :(, and immediately I got a specific loss: .... but nothing =), let's see how it all ends

I have a little bit of my own, but I have not got any profit in this case.

Anyway, all this I packed and ran on the vpce, so that glitches with the internet should not be

 

On H1 with MACD indicator (like MACD) I have lost everything...almost on all pairs...from 5000 to 2000 during the day (4+2 optimization)...I stop testering.

Conclusion: Only m5!

From tomorrow I will bet on m5 with my own indicator.

 
what about m15, m30?
 
mpeugep писал(а) >>

On H1 with MACD indicator (like MACD) I have lost everything...almost on all pairs...from 5000 to 2000 during the day (4+2 optimization)...I stop testering.

Conclusion: Only m5!

Tomorrow I start betting on m5 with my own indicator.

on m5 too, slip in almost all pairs, minus almost 800pp, among those many losing trades, which are already in the history, there was one profitable one =)

 
The trawl version is also more than half of the depo drained... the squeeze doesn't work very well...
 
Shooter, how are you doing today?
 

Also at a disadvantage. Trawl has nothing to do with it. It's not getting to him.

Apparently Monday's start of the hep is to blame.

Reason: