EA N7S_AO_772012 - page 4

 
SHOOTER777 писал(а) >>

In the first three phases I choose from the top 10-12 balances, the best drawdown and good profit factor, and see how the next week behaves. But as a rule it is the maximum balance. And on next three, only best balance, but I eliminate occasional spikes.

If after the first three phases, on the 5th forward week is observed plummet, what do you do in this case? I´ve met it many times, when forward week was losing, should I carry out other steps (week 4 and 5) in this case or just forget about this pair for the next week and not trade it at all because nothing good may come out of it? Do you have any statistics about it? And on whose quotes have you tested? I have fxdd, i have 4 pairs at the beginning of the week, i got drawdown at the beginning of the week too, now i have outgained all i have lost and i am winning. Maybe to change the Awesome oscillator that is used in your EA for gaps at the beginning of the week and exclude the gaps as well. I absolutely agree about choosing the 10-12 best balance, I do not look at the optimization chart, the thicker and darker the spot is, the better it is :)
 
Shtorm писал(а) >>
If you have missed the first three legs and on the 5th one the losses have happened, what do you do in this case? I´ve met such cases many times, when forward week is in the red, should I hold another three legs (week 4 and 5) in this case or should I just ignore this pair for the next week and not trade it at all, because I failed to get anything good out of it? Do you have any statistics about it? And on whose quotes have you tested? I have fxdd, i have 4 pairs at the beginning of the week, i got drawdown at the beginning of the week too, now i have outgained all i have lost and i am winning. For gaps at the beginning of the week may be change the Awesome oscillator that is used in your EA and exclude the gaps as well. I absolutely agree about choosing the 10-12 best balance, I do not look at the optimization chart, the thicker and darker the spot is, the better it is :)

You can't answer in a nutshell, I'll tell you step by step.

Alpari broker. Optimizing on Alpari-Demo. Betting my fifth week on Alpari-Demo. The previous four with good positive results. Forward testing has also shown decent results on euros. I had no power on my PCfor other instruments . I have tested optimized parameters on Alpari-Classic, Alpari-Micro, Alpari-Contest, Alpari-Demo, and MetaQuotes-Demo but only in euro and yen. I cannot say that the results are identical but they are very close.

 

If after the first three stages, there is a plum on the 5th forward week then....

There are a lot of nuances to consider and choose not to fail.

You need to look at buy and sell trades separately. Eliminate deals of less than 10 and more than 50 in 4 weeks.

If there are profits, but the profit factor is less than 2, increase the optimized parameter SL from 80 to about 160.

Also, if you get bad results, you should look at the graph, maybe you should reduce to the last three weeks the period of the first three optimization steps

 

Testing L3 on demo for third day only on GBPUSD. Two days I did not interfere, observed. Came to a conclusion that mostly all trades are opened at the right time and in the right direction. But trawl - has pumped up. On deals which could be accepted for 100-150 pips, only 7-16 pips are accepted. If the movement is not strong enough (50-60 pips) and then the pullback - a stop triggered. In short, in 2 days without any intervention I am down 142 pips.

On the third day I bluntly set a trailing stop of 35 pips at position opening. The result is 150 pips in half of the day.

Besides, it may be the drawdown since the start of Monday due to the gap.

In general, I have some things to improve but on the whole I like it. I will be developing it to my needs. But it is already possible to use signals to make trades. Thank you.

 

Hi all! Good luck and profits!

After the gap recovered and recovered.

The deposit has increased by 658 pips and equity is still hanging around + 450.

Result: third week deposit has doubled in size with 27% drawdown.

So many ideas and suggestions for improvement have appeared!

But even without improvements the growing profit has not let me be lazy and observe.

Let's fight!

 
Hi! I have also improved with my settings :) +162 points, balance +75 baq :)
 
bcbsql писал(а) >>

Testing L3 on demo for third day only on GBPUSD. Two days I did not interfere, observed. Came to a conclusion that mostly all trades are opened at the right time and in the right direction. But trawl - has pumped up. On deals which could be accepted for 100-150 pips, only 7-16 pips are accepted. If the movement is not strong enough (50-60 pips) and then the pullback - a stop triggered. In short, for 2 days without any intervention I am down 142 pips.

On the third day I bluntly set a trailing stop of 35 pips at position opening. The result is 150 pips in half of the day.

Besides, it may be the drawdown since the start of Monday due to the gap.

In general, I have to improve it, but on the whole I like it. I will be developing it to my needs. But it is already possible to use signals to make trades. Thank you.

I have the L5 version.

GBPUSD is a good and stable pair, it alone has already gained 585 pips without any trall.

There is no difference between trawls. I don't know which one to use, but everyone should decide for himself.

 

Hi all!

1. Can you please tell me how to insert additional BTS and neural networksinto this EA , how to link them together?

2. Could you please insert code for automatic optimization of this EA in real trading?

Thanks in advance for the answers :)

 
Turok2000 >> :

2. Is it possible to insert code for automatic optimisation of this EA during real trading?

I wonder how to get these selection conditions into it...!!!


"If after the first three stages, there is a plum on the 5th forward week then....

There are a lot of nuances to be taken into account and choose a non-dealing one after all.

You need to look at buy and sell trades separately. Eliminate deals of less than 10 and more than 50 in 4 weeks.

If there are some profits but the profit factor is less than 2, increase the SL parameter from 80 to about 160.

Also, if poor results are obtained it is necessary to look at the graph, maybe the period of the first three optimization stages should be reduced to the last three weeks".

 
noahbread писал(а) >>

I wonder how to put these selection conditions into it...?!!

"If after the first three phases, there is a plummer on the 5th forward week then....

there are a lot of nuances to take into account and choose a non-draining one after all.

You need to look at buy and sell trades separately. Eliminate deals of less than 10 and more than 50 in 4 weeks.

If there are some profits but the profit factor is less than 2, increase the SL parameter from 80 to about 160.

Also, if poor results are obtained, one should look at the chart and see if it is necessary to reduce the period of the first three optimization stages to the last three weeks".

nothing is impossible, i have worked on such tasks before, any task can be set and solved through zeros and ones, it would be time, desire and necessity.