Casino gambler - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Come on... If you get tails 100 times in a row, the probability of it falling again on the next flip is still =1\2.
The coin has no memory of how it has fallen before.
A test question - some number (combination) has not fallen on the roulette wheel for a long time in what period? Only for today, when I follow it?
Or also for yesterday and for the whole year too?
Well done, 5+. It took me 10 days and 15,000 roulette counts and then processing them on my computer to get to this point. The whole hoax is that we instinctively think that if you get red 10 times, the odds of getting black are higher than they are, but the truth is... it stays 50/50, Scheise... It's very difficult to feel it, but I've come to it through formal processing of roulette spin statistics on a computer.
But if for roulette 15,000 spins is 30 days of work, how long is it for forex trading on the hourlies ? And won't it turn out that after 20 years we will understand that Forex is roulette = absolute chaos.
That's why I decided to start this branch....
I don't want to talk about specifics. I do not deal with cosmic numbers. However, the fact that at the invitation of the investor at numbers with 4 zeros somewhere up to 40-50K $ investor profit per month in the area of 10%. Further on a personal agreement.
PS The letter B usually changes the font to normal.
I'm not exactly ..... I've been pushing the "c" as hard as I can... doesn't work for me, the font stays bold.
As for the numbers - I'll say it again - I think you're fine.
Do you use russian or american broker? If it's not a secret.
Tried it. Tried it on sports. Tried poker.
To be fair -- roulette takes about 3% of the betting odds a bookmaker takes, depending on size and capital -- from 3 to 15% of the bet.
Honest ways to win:
In real roulette, you can theoretically train your eye and increase the probability of guessing and result in a plus MO.
On sports -- there's even a special strategy -- put your probabilities, if my prediction is more likely (let's say I'm a tennis expert), you can get a plus MO.
So, poker -- study the probability table and psychology :) .
Unfair ways:
On sports -- betting on forks at various BKs.
In poker -- for the online option I have an option to increase the probability of winning. It's complicated, but it works.
For real roulette there's even a way to win fairly when roulette isn't fair.
ZZZH having played fairly for a year just for fun, I left BK $1 i.e. won somewhere around 1000 lost by 1 quid more. I'm pretty sure I can win on sports prediction too.
If there were an honest way to win at roulette, the casino wouldn't exist or the rules would have been changed to nullify that possibility -- you're playing AGAINST the casino, and they're not stupid. All the same, in Forex one can regulate profit percentages, the ratio of average stop and average loss, plus one hopes that the sequence of quotes is not close to a white noise, plus we're not playing against someone in particular, against a broker for example, but just change the currency back and forth :) - There is at least some chance, whereas in a casino there are limited stakes and purely random rolls make it physically impossible to win. Go to the roulette stats - over 10,000 and spin them on the computer, you'll see.
I strongly disagree that winning at roulette is "easy", otherwise we'd be spinning it instead of banging on the forum :)
Tried it. Tried it on sports, too. Tried poker.
To be fair -- roulette takes about 3% of the betting odds a bookmaker takes, depending on size and capital -- from 3 to 15% of the bet.
In fact, your actual experience proves that roulette is right :)
well done, A+. It took me 10 days and 15,000 roulette counts, followed by processing them on the computer, to get to this point. The whole hoax is that we instinctively think that if you get red 10 times, the odds of getting black are higher than they are, but the truth is... it stays 50/50, Scheise... It's very difficult to feel it, but I've come to it through formal processing of roulette spin statistics on a computer.
But if for roulette 15,000 spins is 30 days of work, how long is it for forex trading on the hourlies ? And won't it turn out that after spending 20 years we will realise that forex is roulette = absolute chaos.
That's why I decided to start this branch....
Of course, probability theory is not my strong point, but I studied it. Once again - events are equal probability(!) For a coin it means that in a large enough sample heads and tails will fall approximately equal number of times. Otherwise the events are not equal by definition.
About time - it doesn't matter when to start counting - it may be yesterday, it may be tomorrow. The only question is the duration of the follow-up - it must meet the definition of a large sample. There's no exact boundary that separates a large sample from a small one, it's the theory of probability.
If there was a fair way to win at roulette, the casino wouldn't exist, or the rules would be changed so that the possibility of winning would be stopped, because we're playing AGAINST the casino and there are no fools sitting there too. After all
Of course not fools, but fools play, and the smart ones won't always win. And about restrictive rules - they are (!). Go to a casino and read it. Limiting the minimum and maximum bets, or else a stupid martingale, where nothing and do not count will work. Once restrictions in the rules did not exist, was invented 100% winning strategy (martingale) - the rules have changed (!).
ZS. Learn the basics, and if really interested in gambling and their history.
1.Calculate the average of the ranges on an hourly frame, where have you seen such white noise?
2.Prices from the terminal for tomorrow pop up in the exchanges, so this white noise is an integral part of our lives.
3.Technical analysis applies in one way or another to all areas of life, but people who believe in its power I advise to flip a coin 10,000 times and mark the results on the chart.
4.Not increasing the number of lots is not possible to earn.Artful increase in the lot is one of the main advantages of earning on the stock market.Imho.
Probability theory is not my strong suit, but I've studied it. Once again, events are equiprobable(!) For a coin this means that in a large enough sample heads and tails will fall about equal numbers of times. Otherwise the events are not equal by definition.
About time - it doesn't matter when to start counting - it may be yesterday, it may be tomorrow. The only question is the duration of the follow-up - it must meet the definition of a large sample. There is no exact boundary that separates a large sample from a small one, this is the theory of probability.
Of course not fools, but fools play, and the smart ones won't always win. And on the subject of limiting rules - there are(!). Go into a casino and read them. Minimum and maximum bets are limited, or else a stupid martingale where nothing and counting will work. Once restrictions in the rules did not exist, was invented 100% winning strategy (martingale) - the rules have changed (!).
ZS. Learn the basics, and if really interested in gambling and their history.
I did not just walk into a casino, and studied the conditions of all the top, including Western (on line, of course). because i wrote about the restrictions on the fact of experience. so that the mate part read, studied and tested before you write here.
As for the sample size, that's a very interesting and subtle point. I tell you my observations: I built a roulette strategy on certain combinations, I take a sample of 500 spins - the score is flying in the clouds on a sine wave. And whatever sample of 500 spins I did not take, all there are strategy parameters at which the account grows. And after all 500 spins - it takes 5 hours of poking with the mouse non-stop... Another thing is curious, if you take for example 100 spins and count how many times red and how many times black - what percent will be? No way, not 50/50. I got it sometimes as much as 70/30!
But now let's go down to earth - take a sample of 15,000 spins and .... even probabilities, everything is even, the score is corkscrew down, etc.
so the sample size still matters and the counts need to be several thousand, and better still tens of thousands, for the probability theory to work at all.
I did not just go to the casino, and studied the conditions of all the top casinos, including the Western ones (online of course). so I wrote about the limitations of the experience. so the math read, studied and tried out before writing here.
If you want to play in the real one. Less chance of being cheated.
I've seen a couple of engines, not top ones of course, but nevertheless for roulette, for online slot machines. I strongly recommend not to play online.
But about the size of the sample - this is a very interesting and subtle point. I tell you my observations: I built a strategy of working, I take a sample of 500 samples - the score goes to the clouds according to the sine wave.
Can I get a video?
So, the sample size really matters and it should be several thousands of samples and even more - tens of thousands - for the probability theory to work at all.
Probability theory always works. You have to apply it correctly.
Nikola Tesla is my idol.)
he seemed to be communicating with white noise
and gambling sucks.
If you're going to play, play for real. Less chance of being cheated.
I have seen a couple of engines, not top ones of course, but nonetheless, for roulette, for online machines. I strongly advise not to play online.
Can I see a video?
Probability theory always works. You have to apply it correctly.
I found a great online casino, I really think they don't cheat, and now I understand why :))) - There's no need, players will flip on their own.
As for the video, a picture (the result of the programme's work) is of course not a problem to arrange, but what interest will you derive from it?