Casino gambler - page 3

 

а в живую видел кто нить людей которые снимаю деньги с форекса, не посылая их туда постоянно

Put me on the list.

If a person starts earning for real, will they sit on the forum

He will. Intellectual development has never hurt anyone. The community is a good place for it. It is also good to be informed about the latest developments in what you do.

I do it because I don't earn any money :)

That's right :(

However, he who seeks, he will always find. People give up more often than they suffer.

 
Somewhere in the threads it has been shown that forex 1:1 quotes are like the output of Rand() pseudo-random number generators.
i.e. it's not hardware white noise,
but an autocorrelated pseudorandom periodic process.
 
antoxa_zelyonyj писал(а) >>

And besides. Everyone on this forum has higher technical education, I wouldn't be surprised if there were even PhDs, all smart people, but ... and no one's found one yet... That's saying something...

Try wider - all over the world. And you can say that they have unlimited financial possibilities.

All in all it is alchemy, at least for now.

On the other hand, it is not a flip of the coin at all, because the price moves specific market makers with a specific goal (it's about speculation), so sometimes the market is quite random.

As for moving averages, maybe we can create an adaptive algorithm (well, instead of optimizing in the tester) which determines the current market parameters and adjusts the wave period. For example, perform Fourier analysis on one-minute data with a sample width of a week and check if harmonics are present. Then, move the weekly window by minutes and watch how the amplitude/frequency of the harmonics (spectrum peaks) change due to that shift. Respectively, change the waveform period.

Or something like that ;))

 
On the highly liquid market, the price is bound to itself. i.e. it is traded with maximum density and with a minimum range of values. For example on the euro/dollar 1.5505-1.1011-0.8088-1.4050-1.4052-1.4053-1.2122-1.2123 etc. such prices can not be.If the market began to behave so, it lost its liquidity and the chart will look like a starry sky and you should probably guess where the price will go too.
 

In general it seems that so far more votes are in favour of the fact that the market is not random (i.e. from the perspective of an outsider - i.e. me), is predictable and is a good opportunity to make money.

I would like to get more votes and the more objective and cynical the better.


At the same time I want to raise another question: how much can I earn per year or month as a percentage of my deposit, if I do not increase the number of traded lots? I.e. what are we fighting for, what kind of profit? And will it be enough to buy petrol for a Gengi or a BMW?

For me, for example, it turns out that the income is about 100 - 300% per year. Who else?


sayfuji - You are a good person who does not send money there but withdraws it. How much do you think you can earn in a month or a year without any build-up?

(Bold font is not on purpose, I just can not remove it)

 

I don't want to talk about specifics. I do not deal with cosmic numbers. However, the fact that at the invitation of the investor at numbers with 4 zeros somewhere up to 40-50K $ investor profit per month in the area of 10%. Farther-personal arrangement.

PS The letter B usually changes the font to normal.

 
antoxa_zelyonyj >> :

Hello, everyone.

I thought I'd discuss a topic. Who has tried their hand at an online casino? Can you apply technical analysis to a sequence of numbers in roulette? In theory, I think you can - because you do not know what the current price will be the next price, as well as I do not know what number will fall out next. But roulette is simpler - the range of numbers is strictly limited - the eternal flat - if the maximum number fall, bet on the lower, if the minimum, the top, etc. What do you think?

Tried it. Tried it on sports too. Tried poker.

To be fair -- roulette takes about 3% betting a bookmaker, depending on size and capital -- from 3 to 15% betting.


Honest ways to win:

In real roulette, you can theoretically train your eye and increase the probability of guessing and end up with a plus MO.

On sports -- there's even a special strategy -- put your probabilities, if my prediction is more likely (let's say I'm a tennis expert), you can get a plus MO.

So, poker -- study the probability table and psychology :) .


Unfair ways:

On sports -- betting on forks at various BKs.

In poker -- for the online option I have an option to increase the probability of winning. Complicated, but workable.


For real roulette there's even a way to win fairly when roulette isn't fair.


ZZZH having played fairly for a year just for fun, I left BK $1 i.e. won somewhere around 1000 lost by 1 quid more. And I'm more than sure you can win on sports prediction too.

 
TheXpert >> :

I have tried it. And I have tried sports. Tried poker.

To be fair -- roulette takes about 3% of the betting odds a bookmaker takes, depending on size and capital -- from 3 to 15% of the bet.


Honest ways to win:

In real roulette, you can theoretically train your eye and increase the probability of guessing and result in a plus MO.

In sports -- there is even a special strategy -- put your probabilities, if my prediction is more likely (let's say I'm a tennis expert), you can get a plus MO.

So, poker -- study the probability table and psychology :) .


Unfair ways:

On sports -- betting on forks at various BKs.

In poker -- for the online option I have an option to increase the probability of winning. It's complicated, but it works.


For real roulette there is even a way to win fairly when roulette is unfair.


ZZZH having played fairly for a year just for fun, I left BK $1 i.e. won somewhere around 1000 lost by 1 quid more. I'm pretty sure I can win on sports prediction too.

I'll note that tennis is the easiest to win (for me personally). And according to my hard to even say statistics, it's tennis that gets won more often.

 
antoxa_zelyonyj >> :

Hi all.

I've been reading the forum for a while now, and I see that most of the people here are experienced and have no illusions.

I decided one topic pobusitelu. Who's tried their hand at online casinos? Can I apply technical analysis to a sequence of roulette numbers? I think you can - you don't know what the next price will be at the current one, just like I don't know what number the next one will be. But roulette is simpler - the range of numbers is strictly limited - the eternal flat - if the maximum number fall, bet on the lower, if the minimum, the top, etc. What do you think?

Now seriously. Roulette can not vygotovit (I mean honest roulette) because the sequence of numbers that it generates is close to the white noise, in fact its owners and say so, that when generating numbers using a generator of white noise, and the hardware. And what is white noise - a sequence with each successive value is in no way associated (not correlated) with the previous, others

About fair roulette. Just such a roulette game to win is not a problem. I can't say for electronic roulette, but for real roulette - the mechanism is ideal and the ball is thrown with the "closed eyes" (or experienced "experts" can control quite accurately the effort of throwing) In this case, any outcome is "equally likely" (!) And all winning strategies are based on it. Since, if a number (combination) for a long time is not falling out, its expectation grows (!).

Therefore, offline casinos keep track of customers, calculate such roulette players "focused on counting the MO" and expel them without explanation. They can also enter the "blacklist", so that the next casino you'll have time even to approach the table.

By the way about the "perfect" mechanism. Since nothing is perfect and the mechanism is gradually wearing out, then recorded cases where the long observations calculated skewed probabilities and a winning strategy is based on it.

 
TedBeer писал(а) >>

Because if a number (combination) doesn't come out for a long time, its expectation rises(!)

Come on... If you get tails 100 times in a row, the probability of it falling again on the next flip is still =1\2.

The coin doesn't remember how it fell before.

A test question - a certain number (combination) has not fallen on the roulette wheel for a long time over what period? Only for today, when I follow it?

Or also for yesterday's day and for the whole year too?

Reason: