[WARNING CLOSED!] Any newbie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't go by. Can't go anywhere without you. - page 736
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So I have to download the archive and install the Wingdings font and then the indicator should work fine, but the Wingdings 3 needs to be removed?
I found Wingdings too, it looks like this:
http://s46.radikal.ru/i113/1007/2c/90b25d4ab8c6.gifHere I found Wingdings too, it looks like this:
[URL=http://www.radikal.ru][IMG]http://s46.radikal.ru/i113/1007/2c/90b25d4ab8c6.gif[/IMG][/URL]Well no - that's yourWebdings font and we're discussing Wingdings here.
The last question for today is the maximum number of arrays, who knows?
It depends on where. If it is indicator buffers, then no more than 8. If just arrays, as many as you want within reasonable limits :)
And it depends on where. If they are indicator buffers, it should be no more than 8. If they are just arrays, you can get as many as you want within reasonable limits :)
I know about 8. They are arrays. The buffer values of the indicators to be called are written into them.
There are 29 now, we need about that many more...
No, you're theWebdings font, and we're discussing Wingdings.
Yes, you're right, I apologise. I didn't look at it properly. These are my fonts:
http://s004.radikal.ru/i205/1007/8d/c6d51c24ac3f.gifYes, you're right, I apologise. I didn't look at it properly. These are my fonts:
http://s004.radikal.ru/i205/1007/8d/c6d51c24ac3f.gifAnd the terminal needs these to work properly:
I wrote to you - put all 3, you have one missing, the other is broken...
I know about 8. They are arrays. The buffer values of the indicators to be called are written into them.
There are 29 now, we need about the same number...
The logic is as follows:
The limit of 8 indicator buffers is caused by the language itself. It makes no sense to limit the number of other arrays, because it won't exceed the size of RAM + swap file anyway. Therefore, it's not worth overdoing it. What I mean is that a certain amount of RAM is allocated to the array.
Guys, thank you all very much. I'll get right on it. If it doesn't work out, can I bother you?