Is it possible to make bespoke EAs for the championships? - page 3

 
YuraZ писал (а) >>

???


you didn't give any criteria!

But I will.

autotrading is growing in popularity

MQ is growing in popularity

Development Russian

last year's top 10

6 participants from the CIS countries

4 Croatia Usa Japan Canada

ours is in the top 10 60%.

--


my forecast is that there will be more participants from CIS than last year


Let me put it another way. What inflation do you expect this year? Probably less than last year. I'll say more about that later.

I'll give you a couple of reasons. I will add more later in the evening. Again - I chose this platform for my ideas so I am interested in developing it....

1. The people have been frightened by neural networks (I am judging by my own experience as an ordinary consumer). What's the point of fighting if the winner is a neural network? or "the main thing is not to win, the main thing is to participate"? For this case and started a topic on Hidden D-C because after neuronet these EAs will be the best (at least by drawdown, and this, from my point of view, is the main thing, if we are talking only about participation or low-risk profitability).

2. There are strong competitors on the stock market, where you can really earn, and not just learn the technical analysis and the basics of programming.

3. This forum, instead of the broadest propaganda of ideas, strategies ... has a clear bias towards additional earnings of the programmer cohort. Somehow we must separate the paid from the free ideas on this topic. (By the way, if anyone wants to write a tutorial on MQL5, feel free to contact me. I will publish it and you will earn good money).

4. There are fewer programmers. They are becoming more specialized. You have to know how to attract, educate, interest non-specialists. Championship and forex are insufficient and short-lived motivation. The niche is still expanding due to the regional expansion of the Internet. A correction of this trend is inevitable. I think this year. Next year will be better. Enthusiasts brought up and educated in the USSR are receding. The general educational level is going down. Sixties hit men have already faded into oblivion. Mercantile interests are at the heart of the matter. By the way, if the USSR had had a stock market, we would have been rentiers and real owners of factories, land... There would have been a middle class that really drove the economy. But now we are just catching up with the index figures (in Ukraine in 2007 we had 136%) and guaranteed fast money on the stock market. It will last another 5 years. And then it will only be 10,740,000,000 for 100 years out of $100 when trading on an index (I have already given this example five times).


Gone. I'll finish it later.

 

IMHO the Championship is set up for MQL programmers, for those who can write an EA themselves, and not for those who have a working system, but cannot program it in MQL.

If you want to participate, be kind enough to learn the basics of programming (it's not so difficult) at the level of making an Expert Advisor from ready-made blocks (widely available on this site) and take part.

 
Geronimo писал (а) >>

Let me put it another way. What inflation did you foresee this year? *********************************************

FIRST time I agree with Geronimo 101%...

 
Geronimo писал (а) >>

*****************

It would be interesting in the future to divide the championship into categories like: Neural Networks, Using Fixed Lots, Pips, ... or even come up with difficulty categories ... good thoughts on the subject everyone's been reading.

something is wrong with me today apparently =(( again i agree....

 
Geronimo писал (а) >>

Citizen "IMHO" is your friend or a friend of the Championship? Give me a phrase from the article that says that the Championship is created for MQL programmers? I'll give you an example that it is intended for the owners of MQL-related resources to earn more and more. This is a normal business. This championship is just a profitable PR event and not a charity concert, where an amateur performer plays on the instruments of the company that pays for the event.

Can I be excused? I'm not even going to learn the basics. Otherwise, I won't see the forest for the trees. I want to generate ideas. May I? And there are specialists who will implement these ideas. Have you heard about the division of labour? Of course, sometimes I want (as in my childhood) to build a house of bricks, but grown-ups on this site, imagining themselves at the top of the professional pyramid, laugh. That's why they are reluctant. I can count tolerant participants here on my fingers, and missionary efforts are not dense.

It would be interesting to divide the championship into categories, such as: Neural Networks, Fixed-Lot Users, Pips Players ... ...or even come up with difficulty categories ... good thoughts on the subject everyone has read.

So why are you jumping on it? I said it's an IMHO, i.e. my personal opinion, not an opinion that's thrust upon anyone!

No one will ever make fun of newbies on this site. You just have to communicate with people properly.

 
autoforex писал (а) >>

Why are you picking on me? I told you that this is IMHO, i.e. my personal opinion, which is not imposed to anyone!

No one on this site will ever make fun of newbies' code, but will help them understand it. You just have to communicate with people properly.

Come on, I'm just saying that out of helplessness to really make a difference.

 
Geronimo писал (а) >>

>> Bring me the phrase from the regulation where it is written that the championship is set up for MQL programmers?

That was said by the organisers in an unambiguous way.

The last stage of testing: after winning the contest, the author of the winning Expert Advisor gets a phone call and gets a blitz-examination on the knowledge of MQL.

 
timbo писал (а) >>

It was said by the organisers absolutely unambiguously.

The last stage of testing: After the victory the author of the winning Expert Advisor gets a call and arranges a blitz-examination on the knowledge of MQL.


So my prediction is all the more correct.

But it is unlikely that a custom EA will win the Championship. But with a good idea, it can show good results (especially if the conditional categorization is done) in its weight class.

And yet - is it mentioned in the Regulations or somewhere on the forum?

From the Rules ...

... to make at least five... informed transactions ... - In a correct direct action document, the Criteria should be right there...

... be economical in terms of processor and computer memory resources ... - similarly

But what you are writing about is not found.

The Rules don't specify the last stages of verification.

And to do it without stating it in the rules ... - the court will cancel such a test.

Yes, and there is no problem to sign a confidential contract with a programmer, who will be a public figure, and the advisor will be made by Weishaupt group staff or other people who, for whatever reason, need to go public or make the development known.

 
timbo писал (а) >>

Это было сказано организаторами абсолютно однозначно.

Последняя стадия проверки: уже после победы автору победившего эксперта звонят и устраивают блиц-экзамен на знание MQL.

Geronimo wrote (a) >>


From the rules...

... to conduct a minimum of five conscious transactions ... - In a correct direct action document, the Criteria should be there

... be economical in terms of processor and computer memory resources ... - similarly

But what you are writing about I have not found.

The rules do not specify the last stages of verification.

And doing it without stating in the rules ... - The court will overturn such a check.


Yes, it is not mentioned in the Rules, but it is explicitly mentioned in the explanation: How can I become a participant of the Automated Trading Championship 2008?


We conduct the Championship among traders who know a lot about trading on the financial markets and are able to create a trading Expert Advisor by themselves. Consequently, each participant should have the knowledge of the subject matter and be able to answer any question on automated trading.


If you know the material, why are you nervous? Go straight to court? A trader will not be asked about the semicolon at the end of the line. You have to prove your skills first.

Do you participate at all, Geronimo?

 
Geronimo писал (а) >>

Let me put it another way. How much inflation are you anticipating this year? Probably less than last year. I'll say more about that later.

I will give you a couple of reasons. I will add more later in the evening. I repeat - I chose this platform for my ideas so I am interested in its development....

1. The people have been frightened by neural networks (I am judging by my own experience as an ordinary consumer). What's the point of fighting if the winner is a neural network? or "the main thing is not to win, the main thing is to participate"? For this case and started a topic on Hidden D-C because after neuronet these EAs will be the best (at least by drawdown, and this, from my point of view, is the main thing, if we are talking only about participation or low-risk profitability).

2. There are strong competitors on the stock market, where you can really earn, and not just learn the technical analysis and the basics of programming.

3. This forum, instead of the broadest propaganda of ideas, strategies ... has a clear bias towards additional earnings of the programmer cohort. Somehow we must separate the paid from the free ideas on this topic. (By the way, if anyone wants to write a tutorial on MQL5, feel free to contact me. I will publish it and you will earn good money).

4. There are fewer programmers. They are becoming more specialized. You have to know how to attract, educate, interest non-specialists. Championship and forex are insufficient and short-lived motivation. The niche is still expanding due to the regional expansion of the Internet. A correction of this trend is inevitable. I think this year. Next year will be better. Enthusiasts brought up and educated in the USSR are receding. The general educational level is going down. Sixties hit men have already faded into oblivion. Mercantile interests are at the heart of the matter. By the way, if the USSR had had a stock market, we would have been rentiers and real owners of factories, land... There would have been a middle class that really drove the economy. But now we are just catching up with the index figures (in Ukraine in 2007 we had 136%) and guaranteed fast money on the stock market. It will last another 5 years. And then it will only be 10,740,000,000 for 100 years out of $100 when trading on an index (I have already given this example five times).


Gone. I'll finish it later.

(my prediction is that there will be more participants from the CIS than last year)

What does inflation have to do with it?

I did not lift my finger in the sky :-) to make a decision.

I rely on information

a simple analysis of the information, the statistics are in your face, in the first ten days more people have registered than in 2007, here's a simple answer - less will become

interest is high

Why should there be fewer participants?

you still haven't answered clearly


1 neural networks do not intimidate - in the 2007 championship won the neural network because it was a good trend - it was focused on the trend.

If it had chattered like in the beginning of 2008, it would not have won, it's obvious.

4 programmers become more and more every year - I've been doing it for 20 years, I've seen it...

Universals, that's right, there have always been few of them... no one needs them either

if your work requires you to do SQL then you don't need C++ skills

it's better to know everything about something and a little bit about everything else - than to know EVERYTHING.

I smile when I see CVs that say they know as much as a normal person may not know.

as a result, a person can not understand a problem in a particular technology and the problem has to be solved in 10-30 minutes instead of 20 days - people are fed up with such skills as ... fleas, terms and superficial knowledge

Reason: