Hidden divergence - page 52
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
as for me, it does not matter where to enter, at the divergence before or after - the main thing is the direction
---
here is my variant of divergence...
https://championship.mql4.com/2007/ru/users/YuraZ/discussion#comments
https://championship.mql4.com/2007/ru/users/YuraZ/
---
So it would be a good idea to open a THEME, in which Avor and other gurus
would try to formalize not how to catch divergences, but how to choose a direction
Direction? Elementary!!! Will you make a free EA for the Championship?
and you take this illiterate strategist to write MTS? no? that's it?
1.Since divergence is a part of wave analysis, the question of writing MTS rules remains open.
i.e. first of all MTS should
a) to recognize waves.
b) number waves 1,2,3,4,5 a,b,c x,y,z
and only then use the divergence to find an entry/exit.
2. without wave analysis, the divergence is also applicable, and it is possible that there are algorithms to identify the profit,
but unfortunately these algorithms (without wave analysis) have so to speak local meaning, i.e. only for the time being.
3. For clean technicians the divergence gives the possibility to look beyond the period of the indicator, what is useful, but not a grail.
(but for impure ones everything is just a flood) (
Respect to the topic starter Geronimo- he raised the topic, attracted attention and did not let it dry up.
P.S. Divergence is not a great trading feature, but it is the trader's qualification.
I.e. to use divergence adequately you need to be highly qualified.
What I like. It looks like the site might have a specialisation in strategists and programmers. Physicists and practitioners. Which one of them is more valuable. The one who says Party or implies Lenin? I'm putting up an ad - "Recognising Waves - Expensive". Any applications?
Direction? Elementary!!! Will you do an advisor for the championship for free ?
But elementary - why would you need an advisor - any championships
It makes more sense to put a decent amount of money and work at least with your hands.
---
Free no
But if it's elementary - why do you need an advisor - what championships
It makes more sense to put a decent amount of money down and work at least with your hands
---
No free of charge
Which is what I do in a Danish kingdom when I'm short .... Do you think that if you are given a strategy that you are not paid? Strategies cost a MILLION times more than the software you make in a month. After all, it takes years to develop it ...., and the profit you make by using it (because no one will forbid it) will allow you not to write any more programs.
to OZO
well, everything is clear about the party here:
let me remind you: "the main quality of a communist is deep personal conviction" Brezhnev.
.(plum confirmed)
compare with those whom you have called strategists)))
and about education here so:
at the analysis of time series it is necessary to perform the following actions:
1. - remove random outliers from
2. - subtract trned.....
What do you mean subtract the trend? - It is in the silence of the office to lick one graph for many months.
And what about us? We have clones of MACD and pretend the trend has been subtracted))))
Well, there it is - in the form of divergence, which appears when the indicator period mismatches the current wave length.
But where does this discrepancy of the indicator period come from? - it will always be!!!!
So, first of all, we should train ourselves in how a trend looks like.
What I like. It looks like the site might have a specialisation in strategists and programmers. Physicists and practitioners. Which one of them is more valuable. The one who says Party or implies Lenin? I'm putting up an ad - "Recognising Waves - Expensive". Any applications?
Together. Theorists of course. What prevents theorists from trading manually?
Andrei, would you like to continue the time limit?
Already answered long time ago.
If you are not satisfied, write down exactly what you need.
I already replied a long time ago.
If you are not satisfied, write down exactly what you need.
>> It's OK. >> I'll give it a try. Ask for whatever you want ...
Why would the topic be sucked out if...
It's not about whether the divergence is there or not. The indicator is not worse or better than any other.
The point is that it is very subjective, strictly-on-the-eye, and in practice it is very difficult to describe the signals so that they become "machine-visible".
Half a kilo of posts, and not a single one on the point, all in one - "but there is a divergence! Yes there is, there is, for it is a consequence of the behaviour of the wagons. If the market is calm and smooth it will surely work, but where is this calm? And sharp breakdowns are not caught by the wipers or by them - it is lagging. The signal will be seen on the second or third bar after the knot. It means we need an upward/downward movement for 10 bars to work out (if not using pips, of course, otherwise we may get something within one bar). The most important thing is the logic of the signal description. Just change the search criteria - and the picture changes not so much. And every time false signals come along with the correct ones. I've already reworked five of them... They're fucked up. (last two in the picture at the same time).
You get rid of one, another miracle comes along.
Again... what do the waves have to do with it and where? All right, that's just me being dark, I guess.