Hidden divergence - page 47
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Good indicator Div_DigFiltr. But it loads a lot of computer. Can something be done?
It is possible, and very much faster, but it's a big enough job to do it for interest. You should use buffers for intermediate values instead of running in loops at each bar looking for something, and of course you should avoid self-made buffers with SetAsSerias().
Smart, I guess.
No, I'm not. Statistics tell me.
Proof variant.
- At time X the KFOR is formed
- Looking at the previous value of the ZigZag. If the Minimum, we are in the UP Trend. If the Maximum, we are in the Down Trend.
- If after KFOR is formed through n bars, the next "ZigZag point" appears, we consider KFOR has completed its work.
- Let's count the 'only right' ;) number of correct events and compare it with 50%.
'
ZS.
- Unfortunately, I take FX5 as a base (files from 2004 are ready).
- ZigZag is not the best ... TREND filter described by both!!!! authors. If anyone else argues on the subject of "determining that we are on trend", ..... piiiiiiiiiii.
(Before "bullshit" there was a trend, and after "bullshit" according to one author there will be a reversal, according to the other a continuation. + each author has their own "bullshit" + their own DESCRIBED!!!! filters).
So I suggest no more flubbing. Just one more time to write "all assholes" and that's enough!!!!!!
- "Leading ZigZag" is not the best criterion for confirming the fact of "triggering".
BUT. It's about time we started!
Sergey, for the sake of purity of the experiment I suggested to analyse from the beginning of the year on H4 the most famous pair EURUSD (although another one is also possible) and one of the most known indicators CCI (I have more precise - I will give it to those with whom we agree on a new indicator).
And I propose to any interlocutor to prove that after the KFOR signal we will earn, say, less than 30 pips (we can do much more).
And I insist that the signal is 100% triggered.
The drawdown will be less than 10%.
This means we can work with maximum lots and not even set stops.
The same situation will be with other symbols, only the number of points is different for different frames and there is more noise so we will start with the Euro on H4.
I WILL NOW START TO PUT UP THE IMAGES FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR. IF SOMEBODY CONTRADICTS ME - PLEASE DO IT.
I am waiting for comments, after which I will start with the next one, and i will do it till the end of the year.
I WILL NOW START POSTING PICTURES FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR. IF ANYONE REFUTES ME, PLEASE DO SO.
One of the "negatives" that has been voiced here, even by very "uninhibited individuals", is the word "pictures".
It is a stalemate situation - the "interesting idea" (from programmers) for "interesting idea" (although not anymore - not that time in the country and in MT4 development - only for money) => "interesting" idea - statistics => statistics requires an "indicator".
In my case, when I don't want to "dive" into an "idea" (all in quotes so as not to get bogged down in deuteronomy), I try for myself!!!!, first of all, to collect statistics, minimizing, at this stage, coding. (If the "turkey" comes out complicated, I won't even undertake it in principle). I.e. apply a ready-made and free!!!! indulgence. (Again at the first stage).
In the case of CCI - it is most likely CCI_Divergence_V1.1.mq4 (from the attachment, about which rider sronounced) I will try to assemble staaaa... this one .... a lot of numbers. ;)
'
For the same reason, I have, with deep regret, rejected the 's2101 system'. The condition/filter (no matter how you stress it, no one will 'read' it anyway) of his system is 'wave analysis'. There is no ready-made automatic (mechanical/algorithmic) solution for finding the 5th wave, i.e. . is not within the scope of this forum. :) (I will of course try to unload the "waves" from 2004, but not now)
Waiting for comments after which I'll post the next one - and so on for the rest of the year.
Yep. 'No match for 'hurrah' segments => I'm washing my hands of it for now :(
'
ZS. Here we go again - how to explain to the "stupid iron" that the "segments" should be made exactly at those points, which, in "that" case, saw the man. Everything else (DK, KFOR, etc., etc.) is secondary.
Geronimo As far as I understand the SKY DIVERGENCY - we understand it the same way
it is indeed a confirmation of a trend, but it is not uncommon for sD to occur at the peak of a reversal
so we have to fight it somehow.
the trend is not the same for a D1 trend may be UP on the M15 at this time steep DOWN trend
The 1st variant is calculation of the number of SC at this timeframe + other methods
2) got DIVER - not a DIVER we start counting (for buy)
2.1 we get 1Second Handle that is higher than the NON-CLOSED DIVERSITY (enter) stop below the NON-CLOSED DIVERSITY
2.2 we got 2SC HIGHER THAN 1 SC we may think trend is going up and we just hold position ( or may go long )
2.3 we get 3SC or already 4th ( it may be a harbinger of the last wave) it is dangerous to enter
something like this
---
i would like to understand how you would recommend to NOT EXIT on the return signals because i.e. i see a pattern in the second half of the day.
what is the criterion?
Yuri - here is my screenshot with KFOR on the same interval. Compare it with yours. One of the exit recommendations I gave as an exit on appearance of MAC or nearest fractal or . I wrote above how to get the Manual Trading Rules.
Why a MM with refills? Greed is a vice. I do not use MPC as a signal to open positions and I do not consider it here. I use it in correlations strategy, but that is another story...
Or to filter the signals of divergences created by other oscillators (MACD,RSI,CCI.... or custom oscillators).
You can. And you should. But start with H8 and you'll see which ones suit you best and with which settings.
2/3
-
about unloaded ZigZags.
At first I hoped to select previous value in Access(surely everybody has it, unlike MS SQL), but then I decided, that it's easier to unload
- about writing to file - I decided not to make any troubles (quick) and for the case without "stuff" I did something like this
If it's for me, I don't get it.
If it was for me, I didn't understand anything.
It was "to myself" - sort of a "blog" :). (Just some method of collecting at least some statistics).
3 not of 3
So I will try to "digitise" Geronimo's definitions (from page eight) in "my" terms:
- "Hidden" Div-Con on a bullish trend : ANSWER:
divCurrency = Price[last peak] / Price[previous peak] < 1 - NONE. NEXT. TALKING ABOUT TROUGHS
divInd = Indicator[last peak] / Indicator[previous peak] < 1 - YES, OR VERY close to 1
Bullish Trend - ZigZag's 3rd buffer at previous "extremum" > 0 - EASY CONDITION
- "Hidden" Div-Con on a bearish trend
divCurrency = Price[last peak] / Price[previous peak] > 1 - NONE. NONE.
=DIVInd
Indicator[last peak] / Indicator[previous peak] > 1 - YES, OR VERY CLOSE TO 1
Bullish Trend - ZigZag's 2nd buffer at previous 'extremum' > 0 - EXCEPT ....
'
Preliminary ZZY. I still don't understand the phrase "the troughs in the indicator are deeper than the troughs in the price chart
", i.e.divInd > divCurrency? - YES, BY ABSOLUTE VALUE. I ALREADY WROTE THAT WE MEASURE IT IN % BY COMPARING IT TO THE EXTREMES ON THE CHART AS WELL.