You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Oh, that's right, it's not good for the package.
What would you like?
Would you like? I wish I had confidence and peace of mind, like I did yesterday with the old version of virtual equity indicator, while the alparians have been correcting their mistake :)
The trades seem to be closed by mistake when they were closed by a stop out, but they will be restored - and while they are restoring - the equity of the account changes, while the indicator shows a real picture of the virtual events development :) You are calm for its readings and you take them for granted because they have been checked - no mines :) So, you can make informed decisions :) I have to thank Igor for that.
Oh, that's right, it's not good for the package.
What would you like?
default numbers and [0,0]+&-30 - stop and profit lines relative to [0,... for each strategy
What would you like?
I think it would be convenient to draw our trend lines from and to some horizontal levels. On the history we can see whether the price has passed or failed from one level to another. For example, if the price has passed from one level to another, we draw a "blue" trend line between them. If it is vice versa, we draw a "red" one from the level from which we have entered the market till the level at which we have taken a stop loss.
It's not convenient to correct by n-points and enter them in the properties of the trend. It's the same egg but it's more convenient to count points...
I think it would be convenient to draw our trend lines from and to some horizontal levels. The history will show whether the price passed or failed from one level to the other. For example, if the price has passed from one level to another, we draw a "blue" trend line between them; if it's vice versa, we draw a "red" one from the level from which we entered the market till the level at which we have a stop loss.
It's not convenient to correct by n-points and enter them in the properties of the trend. It's the same egg, but you need to sit on the side and count points...
and in reply - silence
and the answer is silence.
It is too beautiful figure under the avatar, did not want to violate:)
Don't worry, the process is going on. When the working version is ready I will post it. There are some difficulties with transaction logging function. It needs to be rebuilt.
I am working on variants of setting SL and TP. I will probably enter them in the description and indicate as icons on the chart.
PS: I would like to attach a video, but something does not work:(
and the answer is silence.
You have to set the levels with numbers (even slower), or with a separate indicator, or to react to an object,
here we are asking the author and struggling to reduce the speed (labour intensity) of analysis
so, levels should also be set in numbers (even slower in input speed) or by a separate indicator or to have a reaction to some kind of object,
Here we are asking the author and fighting to reduce the speed (labor intensity) of analysis.
Let me give you an example. For example, we have a simple indicator that draws three horizontal lines at the beginning of the day. The middle line is the opening price of the day and two others are equidistant from it by n pips. The middle line is the market entry level, the line in the north is our take and the stop loss in the south. Right? Now I'm talking about labour-intensive. On the history, it is easy to mark the year with the colour corresponding to the profit or loss, stretching the trend line from the middle line to the others, without looking at the price, and moreover on the closure or opening of the candles and commenting on them.
The number under the avatar is so pretty, I didn't want to violate it:)...
+7