Total wiretapping is being introduced - page 41
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
In the new age, local states will not be needed, they will only get in the way
It is also possible to buy a flat with a mortgage. So the bottom line is that the purchase is big and exceeds the annual income, but the money was given as a loan. Everything is legal.
A close relative of mine once tried to take out a loan of 10 million roubles. And with the security of his house as collateral. He spent a lot of time and went round all the banks, but none of them would give him a loan. And here we are talking about a sum ten times as much. Who is going to give you a loan when you know that you will not be able to repay it even before the end of your life?
I don't know, I don't have enough information to answer that question. I can say that about a year ago there was a scandal with a bank or even several banks. They issued loans without any collateral to fictitious people with forged documents, and the money went to who knows where, and the bank subsequently went bankrupt. It is not for nothing that the Central Bank took away the licences of many banks in 2016 alone.
It seems to be the policy of the Central Bank to weed. by 20-25%,
it is easy to analyse, there is a publicly available book of banks which clearly shows the growth and decline in the number of banks
in a little while there will be no states
mankind is rapidly moving towards globalisation
multipolar world = medieval archaic
Really?
I see a lot of states being divided by outside forces, some demanding independence...
And you talk about globalization... Stop fantasizing about utopia...
And Sobochak...
If you use your brain, analyze the phone calls and find her sponsor! -
Oops... So that's why this Yarovaya package is so rebellious.
<And with a brain in it> Indeed, why don't you have a brain in it? Then you would immediately have the first very simple thought, is it a coincidence that it came to her exactly when she had that kind of money and not a day earlier or a day later? Correct! It suggests that she and all her phones/smartphones/tablets have been "herded" around the clock without any wintering laws.
The second thought that would have crossed your mind is that if there really was any crime found there, she would not be on holiday in Italy now, but somewhere in the Magadan region.
You see, sometimes it's good to use your brain. Give it a try. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
<And with a brain in it> Indeed, why don't you have a brain in it? Then you would immediately have the first very simple thought, is it a coincidence that it came to her exactly when she had that kind of money and not a day earlier or a day later? Correct! It suggests that she and all her phones/smartphones/tablets have been "herded" around the clock without any wintering laws.
The second thought that would have crossed your mind is that if there really was any crime found there, she wouldn't be on holiday in Italy now, but somewhere in the Magadan region.
You see, sometimes it's good to use your brain. Try it. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
in a little while there will be no states
mankind is rapidly moving towards globalisation
multipolar world = medieval archaic
That's what Alexander was heading towards as well. If we talk about the future, of course someday there will be a time without states and religions, the family where all society will bring up offspring and where people will not separate and set themselves above the others in the same society (as in religions - all people are brothers), perhaps the very essence of habitual reproduction will disappear. Doesn't remind me of anyone from the movies). To me aliens. Maybe it is us who have evolved and are, with the level of technology enabling such things that aliens do, have grown to the point where it is possible to control the present through corrections in the past. Eventually, in fact, the circle is closed and our life is the best possible way of development. Not in vain they say in religions that one cannot escape fate, and that one must simply accept his/her way and live in harmony with the opinion that this is your way, whatever it is, and it must be passed. Fate is the optimal path, which would have been formed if there was an opportunity to go through it, return and change it.
Thoughts are dark about it))).
But that's when it will be. Either after the problem of overpopulation is solved in other ways. Or after one country's government takes over all the others. Actually it is not difficult.
It is not just about taking over, it will not be much of a help. It will be more difficult to legislate when the wars will not be between the countries and within one country between the population.
This will lead to the same kind of imposition of order by an iron fist - this is a dead end. It is much more effective to preserve states for the time being and bribe governments to create controlled wars so as not to have spontaneous and uncontrolled wars. Besides it is easier to bring people (to force to evolve) at this stage in their racial and religious environment (the essence of religion is the same, they were created for something), that is why any attempt to stop the state-racial-religious order of the world order - in any history ended with the death of the instigator (in a strange way).
So, to give up religions for people will be much easier (when the managerial role of morality will disappear from it, as well as the role of the state-country). It is much more difficult to change the institution of family, while it will be changed, and they already change it.
There are many points of view, some are quite wild, that may be such a monogamous society already exists, formally there are borders of states for the population, but in reality there has been a mono-government at the top for a long time. And to manage the population by localizing them within different borders and religions is, as it turns out, the most profitable for now.
The question is how exactly we will be led to this, through chipping like sheep or there are longer but humane ways. And if we do not choose the outcome, I would like to participate in choosing the path to the outcome.
The problem of overpopulation in a mono-population will be no less acute, and the states are different - not to justify the wars that can control this very population. Either the society will reach the level of development when it can find a humane way out of the situation, or it will be forcefully lead to the decision of those who are in charge and not the society, and the level of control will allow it.
So it is not known yet, whose "democracy" will be "more democratic" in the existing world or in a monocoque world.
One can move into the future in different ways, but there will always be those who can get something out of it.
That's it, I'm going to become a sectarian.
Do you think no one understands that?
p.s.
I would like to point out that you spell your words with a capital letter, that's a rule of social etiquette.
It means respect for the other person and respect for the opinions of others, one of the most important principles of the true values of democracy and liberalism.
In my opinion democracy is no better than a monarchy.
Under the monarchy there was an elite - the nobility, now the elite are deputies. Nothing changes, there is only an illusion that at elections you choose someone. Actually to the average person, so simply from the street to get in this elite is unreal. One must collect signatures to stand as a candidate, and that requires a team to run for signatures. Nobody will sign for an unknown person, nobody needs advertising, campaigning, and here it comes out that it all requires money. If you can put together a team of enthusiasts, then PR requires money.
The result is that most elected officials are nominees of someone else. They are sponsored to lobby for their interests.
Z.U.
In the USA, their renowned democracy is like a farce. There are two stages to electing a president. First, the electors are elected by popular vote, and then the electors elect the President of the USA. It is much easier to bribe or otherwise influence the election of an individual elector than all the people of the country.