DenisR: And apart from the blah-blah, can't you CONSTANTLY refute (with evidence) specific statements? It reminds me of an old joke: two dogs meet, one big and one small. The big one asks the little one: "Who are you? The little one says: "I'm a French Bologna, who are you?" The big one says: "I'm nothing, I'd like *****..."
Президент России Владимир Путин подписал так называемый «пакет Яровой» 7 июля. Этот документ сильно поменял росссийское законодательство, в том числе в части регулирования интернета. В числе прочего «пакет» ввел административную ответственность за два новых правонарушения: — За использование несертифицированных средств шифрования при передаче...
Mandatory certification is only foreseen for encryption of state secrets
It's strange and confusing. What if I write a software program for encryption and correspond with a friend? Can I do it, or will I be charged 300 thousand dollars at once?
Dmitry Fedoseev: It is strange and unclear. What if I write a software program for encryption and correspond with a friend? Can I do it, or am I immediately liable for 300 thousand dollars?
this act is not prohibited (at least as long as there are no restrictions on the private use of encryption tools)
And apart from the blah-blah, can't you CONSTANTLY refute (with evidence) specific statements? It reminds me of an old joke: two dogs meet, one big and one small. The big one asks the little one: "Who are you? The little one says: "I'm a French Bologna, who are you?" The big one says: "I'm nothing, I'd like *****..."
Not the DPI* that usually blows, but by eleven o'clock - knock...
___________________________
DPI = Deep Package Inspection
Not the DPI* that usually blows, but by eleven o'clock - knock...
___________________________
DPI = Deep Package Inspection
some clarification on the provisions of the law
It probably won't affect privacy.
why couldn't it have been explained in human language in the first place?
https://meduza.io/feature/2016/07/21/kak-fsb-sobiraetsya-ispolnyat-trebovaniya-paketa-yarovoy-spoyler-do-sih-por-neponyatno
In the meantime, the repeal vote is still not in.
https://www.roi.ru/28432/
some clarification on the provisions of the law
It probably won't affect privacy.
why couldn't it have been explained in human language in the first place?
https://meduza.io/feature/2016/07/21/kak-fsb-sobiraetsya-ispolnyat-trebovaniya-paketa-yarovoy-spoyler-do-sih-por-neponyatno
In the meantime, the repeal vote is still not in.
https://www.roi.ru/28432/
How the hell do I know what encryption tools are there and how certified they are? Do I have to do that too?
mandatory certification only for encryption of state secrets
Mandatory certification is only foreseen for encryption of state secrets
It is strange and unclear. What if I write a software program for encryption and correspond with a friend? Can I do it, or am I immediately liable for 300 thousand dollars?
this act is not prohibited (at least as long as there are no restrictions on the private use of encryption tools)