You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Total freedom in the information environment, the internet being one of them, is only needed by those who have an advantage in this field. It is easy to sign disarmament agreements when you go toe-to-toe or when you are weaker than your opponent. And it is easy to walk away from an agreement when your opponent has been weakened through other approaches, which has affected defence, and then to resent their armament when they start to gain strength again. The advantage of information technology is the states now, so they need freedoms in this area (on the legislative level), because the benefits from spying, opinion-forming and other manipulation through these areas of their technology are greater than anyone else. If the situation were symmetrical, the states would not only make wiretapping legal, they would be the first to push for restrictions in this area, and try to spread it to everyone else.
Freedom and a screen of democracy are needed only by those who have money to live by this order. And because no one has promised a bright future where everyone will live well, in the current order of things, "money" for a good life for all is not provided from the beginning. And in order to make something good, you have to give your own or take it away from someone else and cut it down.
The duplicitous attitude towards journalists only confirms this. When it comes to their point of view, freedom of speech and information is immensely protected. As soon as that point of view is different, publications are banned, files are withdrawn from public access, and journalists' freedom of movement around the world is restricted. To which the human rights defenders who defended freedom of speech yesterday are silent. What about human rights defenders, half of these westerners are doing exactly the same thing.
I read this text in the voice of a political officer
But it is true: Weak and lagging countries and regimes tend to impose more restrictions and more control and oversight.
I'm sure half of local westerners do not give a shit about politics, but it is unpleasant when you visit at least a Lurkmor and you get a "nadzor" to show you should not read it.
I knew one personally, died in poverty before he was 50
a bunch of inventions - and exclusively for ALL the military stamped - (just in case) - and the invention went down the drain.
--
and exclusively in all of them he appeared as a person in the third even in the fourth place.
and at the top was the director of the institute as the author, then the chief engineer and then his boss
i.e. he was some kind of co-author!
that's to say about copyright and conditions! that's to say about the system as a whole
There was a very good article about conceptual thinking in the "Interesting and humorous" thread (p.3094). In brief: "Conceptual thinking can be defined through three important points. The first is the ability to determine the essence of a phenomenon or object. The second is the ability to see the cause and predict consequences. The third is the ability to systematise information and build a coherent picture of the situation." The authors argue that less than 20% of the population of any country possess this quality. If to analyze any group of the population (entrance, house, yard, any labor collective, etc.), I think, it will come out so. You don't have to go far - among my acquaintances almost no one can answer even the simplest question. Some of them honestly say "I don't know", some of them keep quiet without even trying to find any arguments, the rest of them repeat that "it's all the fault of the pindosia", but they cannot explain what exactly it is. They are good people, but they have problems with their thinking.
So I think your interpretation that they always have MORE stupid bastards is wrong. In form, some statements are quite crude, but in fact, against science, as they say, can not be argued. So if you now write that the sky is blue, you should immediately be considered a "fifth column"?
No, if I write that the states' policy of imposing
read this text in the voice of a political officer
but a good point: weak and backward countries and regimes tend to impose more restrictions and more control and oversight
I'm sure half of the local westerners do not give a damn about politics, but it is unpleasant when you go to at least lurkmor and you are told you should not read it.
Is this an answer to my post? If only you could explain why people, who could not feel gratitude to the authorities for not being imprisoned (a sharashka is the same as a prison), quite successfully continued to create and invent, which contradicts your verdict:"Where discoveries are made - where the conditions are and are created". Or maybe the conditions at the sharashka were conducive to it?
Some of these 20 will want to develop and live in harmony with the other 80, while others can exploit these 80 like sheep, widening the gap in power and money between this 20 and the 80.
Ask you a specific question about what you personally/your parents/friends/colleagues, etc., have been "planted", I'm sure you won't be able to say anything specific (at best, you'll fall back on general phrases). Personally, I have not had anything pushed on me.
I can, and I did. It's just amazing that when you get specific, the opponents for some reason go straight into a frenzy of banter and so on, and then surprisingly they all get rubbish at the same time.
It's a paradox. You pick on how bad things are and that there is no "pushing", but maybe things are bad because of a successful multi-pronged policy of pushing? At all levels. It cuts right to the chase at the stage of just the rudiments of thought.
Of course, I understand that you've probably read articles about the Kotelnicheskaya embankment, watched videos on YouTube about gelentwagens, etc. But, still, please do not forget that this resource is primarily dedicated to trading and programming, so clearly criticizing our government for the gap in the level of power and money, as you do, is not accepted here. You can go on and on about the pindosia as much as you like.
It is more of an oppositional trick to use it as an official source.
The gap between the people and the power in America is many times bigger, but the circle of this real power is smaller, and besides this gap is not palpable for the population, because all the consequences are spread out in other countries. And I have not denied such a gap in our country. I just have a very strong feeling that our liberal elite, after coming to power, will not begin to sharply reduce all this business, against which demonstratively and ostentatiously fight, but instead will dissolve it in an even greater scale. I do not need to look back for examples, we are still dealing with it. Yes, the rich may become richer, but only within the same circle of party-pop faces, it will not bring anything to ordinary people from the hinterland.
Nikkk:
Here you are picking on how bad things are, and what not, and maybe things are bad as a result of a successful multi-pronged plantation policy? On all levels. This cuts right to the chase at the stage of just the rudiments of thought.
No need to switch from a form of dialogue to a form of outright lies, it doesn't suit you. There is NO word "bad" in my vocabulary at all, so, dear Nikkk, although your nickname has three letters k (there used to be such an organization kkk in your beloved Finland you keep writing about, are you from there?), but, as they say, lie but don't get it wrong. If you say the same thing about my words, I warn you right away: I will not communicate with you anymore. Don't be offended then.
If you are able to be specific, then please tell us all what rudiment has been cut off from you personally at the rudimentary stage? If it is something below the waist, it is possible in private.